EWS #176 Current Affairs – V The Distruptors + Q&A

30 Sept 2023

Alina (0:00:27)
Namaste! welcome back to our continuing series Evening with Sraddhalu

Sraddhalu (0:00:36):
Namaste, happy to be with all of you.

Alina (0:00:40)
We are happy to continue this series which was started by Narad and he is joining us very soon. I don't know if he's online yet, but we will be greeting him again. Namaste.

Narad (0:00:55)
Namaste.

Alina (0:00:56)
We will continue our theme on the current affairs with part five in the series. Now we will be exploring the actors who are disrupting the globalist agenda. As usually, you may post your questions in the chat box on our YouTube channel, Integral Studies, or you may send your questions beforehand to our email id, integralstudies.in[at]gmail.com and I will let Sraddhalu resume what we discussed last time.

Sraddhalu (0:01:45)
This is the fifth in the series and I would like to before taking up the questions quite a few have been pending. I wanted to complete certain points that we had covered so far but for those of you who might be coming to this one for the first time, I would highly recommend that you watch the other four before. They set a context without which what we discuss now and thereafter would not make sense. It is not always very comfortable to look at some of that material of what goes on behind the scenes, it can be a little troubling, but if we put it in context that behind it all there is a greater compelling inevitable divine power, then it does not disturb us, but it gives us the necessary tools and understanding by which we can fight the battle better.

In the first of the series we had spoken of the choice before us, truth or the abyss and what it involves, the nature of the crashing circumstances.

In the second one we saw how humanity has built this wall, organized it across centuries to block out the light, to block evolution, to literally enslave the human mind, human consciousness and even pervert.

But then in the third of the series we saw the power behind and the power behind is not merely the actors that we see on the surface, the people we know, the people we like or dislike or who deceive, who lie, who don't. But there is actually a continuing agenda across lineages of interests, not just families, sometimes institutions, behind which are certain occult powers and we saw the correspondence of the same powers which were behind the Nazi ideology being still working now behind so many other institutional frameworks for a one-world government which suppresses human freedom and enslaves humanity and the human mind. It is towards this that Sri Aurobindo intervened in the Second World War and took sides precisely to prevent this kind of a framework. But we saw that this ideology, the mindset, the energies, the powers behind have not vanished, they are still playing around.

And in the last discussion that we had on the occult dimension we went much deeper into this and what the Mother had to say about the powers behind. She specifically mentions one of the Asuras who calls itself the Lord of the Nations and who is behind all the wars, she says, simply. And recall also that she said ‘eventually he knows that he will lose’, and what he said to her was that ‘although I know I will lose, I will do the maximum damage I can before I go’.  And the Mother said, well, he does not know, he is one of my children and so therefore she has a very different relationship. And we saw that as long as humanity supports the interests and gives access to the Asuric energies, well, they have a free play. It is when we refuse that they can no more intervene or when we develop within ourselves the necessary clarity, transparency, purity of intention that they do not have a hold within us anymore.

But we went in some depth last time particularly on how they have organized this whole technology of influencing people, a kind of a mass hypnosis, specializing in an individual hypnosis and we saw what can be done through some of these processes. Essentially they involve separating the surface personality from the psychic influence and thereby inserting so many different kinds of motivations, influences, hypnotic programmings, all of which can be dissolved easily when the psychic influence comes forward, if it is allowed to come. And that's why for us this is so important and yet their attempt today with the globalization of the media as well as the internet and the powers financial, political and otherwise, they have the ability to beam out massively through a single movie made in one corner of the world, broadcast it overnight on all channels, just like that, a message that everybody sees, is shocked by, is disturbed or is affected, influenced, hypnotized, etc.

So the agenda is now extremely easy to accelerate and at the same time for us if we so choose it can equally be easy to break out of it, of which the first step would be to become aware of what's happening. And then becoming aware of what's happening, turn to what is within you, to give you the discrimination and to help you become free.

(0:07:06):

We drew heavily last time on Ronald Bernard's descriptions, which I find to be one of the most important and I described also how the techniques of mind control which start with dulling the higher faculties through inebriation of various kinds and through certain combinations of drugs as well as hypnosis is easily multiplied through some of the rituals today given to children in schools and universities in adult modern life through what he described through cinema and through those activities of what they call parties where they get totally inebriated and the entire programming just goes in, seeps in and catches you. And it's exactly the same program used for the initiation rituals of secret societies and so on. So it's a very simple template of technology. Once you recognize it, you can easily, well, break out of it or at least begin to make the steps. What we see which is fascinating also is this melding of financial, political, media, military and occult powers. And we got a glimpse of that last time.

You will recall in one of the discussions, probably the very first one on this topic, first or second one, I had given an example of a friend of mine who was in a university and he was taken into one of these secret societies and they tried to initiate him and then he chose to break. And what he saw was everybody, everywhere, the smartest people, the people he would most respect were all part of the society. But the part which I did not mention in that discussion was subsequently, 10, 15, 20 years down, when he looked at the situation in his town, in his city, all these people were now in positions of power, the highest power. One was a mayor of that city, one was the police chief, one was a judge, one was a media head and it was all organized. Now think about it this way, when people have grown up in such a kind of a secret society where they are sworn to support each other and have now been bound in an occult structure and now they get to power like this, the same mentality continues. They do not know what it means to be questioned. They do not know what it means to be told no, to be denied.

And this becomes also a great weakness of this organized cabal. And so this is a broad background I wanted to give by which we understand why things are the way they are. Otherwise, the error we have all been making is to say, ah, yes, today there is economic disruption because politicians are not good, which is because education is not good, which is because there is not enough finance, which is because there is economic disruption– and it's a tautology. You are in a circle, it's a dog chasing its tail, you never get to anything. You try to change it, you find yourself at every step, in every direction blocked.

And if you just stop there, you will say we don't understand why. It's just declined. No, it's not. Behind it, and this is what we try to expose, the powers that organize all this, who create the tautology, who give you the illusion of a tautology, but who actually orchestrate it, that's what we have to recognize. And these are human powers and behind those, of course, the Asuric powers. But above it all is a diviner power, which needs equally instruments on earth. We saw last time how the Asuric side has organized instruments, that actually created lineages of, we may use the word, vehicles or mediums, through which to sustain and amplify and organize their influence in earthly affairs.

Sri Aurobindo describes how as a result of the descent of the supramental consciousness, there is a pressure on all the worlds and it's as if the vital world has been projected onto the material world and is looking to seize on material instruments and this means a lot of psychological problems which will be one of the signs which we do see anyway. So all this gives you an understanding that there is no tautology. There is a very orchestrated, organized system from top down to ensure the appearance of this sense of helplessness.

But we are not helpless. I gave example last time also of how institutions have been corrupted, including the religious institutions. I particularly mentioned several of the institutions which were owned by the church and even some of the members of the church etc who are involved in this kind of thing. But it's not limited to the church. Any organized religious institution as long as it is organized in a hierarchy is vulnerable to hijacking.

So I want to give one more example here. There was in the South of France a Tibetan community and it was run by somebody called Sogyal Rinpoche, there was a huge exposure around that. About 60 children, parents had left the children there thinking they can be trusted, this is the best education they would get. Almost all of them were sexually abused by this head as well as deprived from food, deprived from clothing, tortured in various ways, etc.

(0:12:30):
And when this finally broke out, because the children as children thought this is normal, when eventually they broke out and they actually came to the recognition that they had been violated in ways which are inhuman and began to speak of it and the parents began to speak of it, within the Tibetan Buddhist community, all the other heads who had any power came together and said, ‘no, we have to denounce this man and remove him from the system’.

They held a three-day meeting with the Dalai Lama, seated for three days in one place. I don't know why it should take three days to denounce, but they were preparing a document and they went back and forth, back and forth to prepare a final document which would declare that this man had nothing to do with Tibetan Buddhism and he was denounced from it. At the end of those three days, the decision of course was that the Dalai Lama would sign. That's why it took so long to describe it had to be very nuanced because he is equally a political head. At the end of the three days, when the document was finalized, the Dalai Lama said oh but since all of you have been part of this, everybody should sign. So they all said Everyone signed the paper.

Meanwhile the Dalai Lama left the hall and the paper was sent to him for final signature. They waited two weeks, three weeks. Finally the Dalai Lama sent back the paper saying your signatures are enough, you can release it. But he didn't put signature; this was a huge setback to the Tibetan Buddhist Community. Many of the elders there were very disappointed but you have to understand how this works. There is a dependence of powers, of interests and sometimes good people can be easily sucked into it.

But I want to touch an angle which is more subtle. Why does this person Sogyal Rinpoche get into this perversion? Because if you look at his reputation, if you look at what he was known for and appreciated for, you find some pretty extraordinary things. If you look up his name, you will find that he was the translator of Tibetan Book of the Dead, which was translated into some 56 languages and he was keynote speaker in Parliament of Religions, 8000 religious heads, he had so many worldwide following and so on. Why does such a person get into this kind of perversion?

And this you have to understand more deeply. You see, we have this tendency to whitewash big name, famous people, but you have to understand Tibetan Buddhism itself has a heavy content of occultism. And anyone who has understood this a few steps inside will see it's not just what the Buddha taught. It is the prior born religion, I think it's called, blending in with a lot of occultism which makes for that peculiar blend. But in that there are deities. Of course, there are always made positive deities, but there are equally Asuric deities. But many of these have a character which is not always positive and many of these are actually Vital beings who are respected or worshipped as deities. So when a person is part of such an occult framework, uses occult practices to gain power and that's how he becomes famous, that's how Sogyal Rinpoche became so powerful and within the communities in the world. When he uses that, there is always a quid pro quo.

There is an engagement with the being which is working through him in which this man opens to that being and actually the being gradually possesses, the process which we described last time. To a point where he is actually capable of not recognizing what is his will and what is the being's will. To a point where he can do something which is perverse and actually think it is normal because it is normal for that being. That's how the whole thing works and that's how he got sucked into this whole perversion and once a victim of it, there is no end to how far it can go.

What happens then because he is raising so much money, because there is so much at stake, because there is an interconnection between many of the senior people, others are afraid to denounce and so on. But this is to say, wherever it is organized, you are open to hijack. There is only one religious spiritual tradition in the world which is not organized and that is the Hindu tradition. What is called Hindu tradition or what is broadly in itself called Sanatana Dharma, the underlying, literally means eternal truth. Dharma being the underlying truth which upholds, Sanatana eternal. So here is a framework which is so broad, so supple, so open, so universal that anybody has place in it as long as you pursue the basic approach which is verify, validate and build upon experience. Not beliefs, not stories, not theories, but actual experience.

(0:17:44):
And so you have so many different traditions, so many lineages that it has become impossible to hijack this. Yes, certain branches, certain lineages have been hijacked. And you see that in Punjab there was somebody recently who was arrested for similar things and that will happen. But you cannot hijack something which is not a monolith, which is non-hierarchical, which is so decentralized and which is based on experience.

And as long as people have a basic discrimination of who they choose to trust or follow, you cannot hijack the movement. But the moment you have a hierarchy, for example in this case, Sogyal Rinpoche was authorized, anointed, declared the reincarnation of a very famous Lama who was very big and well known. Now you have a hierarchy where he has been assigned and now you have to obey, you have to follow. Even if you see him do wrong, you cannot question because he is supposedly that great Lama. Well, you have lost your discrimination, you have lost the power of common sense.

So this is the one framework I will say and I am not even calling it a religion, it is a framework within which you have so many traditions which was very difficult to hijack. It is one of the reasons why it has still not been fully hijacked. Well, you can hijack parts of it or you can turn it around as has been done by the ascetic impulse in the traditions. But even then there is a corrective possibility because there is no centralization. And this is one of the reasons why today you will find in India all the large powers are one pointedly focused on destroying this. And this comes from religious traditions, Islam and Christianity which have tried to convert India and they have failed so far but have made massive inroads and then there is the leftist ideology which has tried to hijack and somehow they have lost.

So the nature of this struggle is also very interesting and because India has the roots in the spiritual tradition, it was, and Sri Aurobindo actually goes so far as to say that God always keeps for himself one space on earth in which the highest knowledge is preserved. And at least for this Chatur Yuga, this cycle of four Yugas, that country is India. So because that knowledge is still preserved here, it is still a focal point for the global interests to exterminate this, I will not yet say light, but I will say a potential light, half awake light. So, this is just to give you a background of some of these things. I had many more examples which I wanted to take, which I didn't cover and maybe it’s not necessary we have got the basic idea for these things.

One point though which I will complete with, as part of the discussion from last time, sometime in 1992 I believe, the head of the CIA was giving a presentation as part of a US Congress investigation and he made this declaration in what is called Operation Mockingbird. He said that at this point we have, we meaning the CIA, has the capability to control something like 90% of the US media and something like 85% of the global media and he said they can insert any story, remove any story or spin any story in any direction and this was this is still on record as the congressional hearing and this you must understand is about now thirty years ago in these thirty years that control has gone far far far beyond and so it's the reason why so much of what we discussed all of the evidence is there will not be available.

The problem is the moment you start investigating and looking for these, the same powers will insert now mixed content and create what is called the controlled opposition as well as confusion. So they will take a truth, add into it a twist and then falsify the truth on the basis of this twist. And so finding reliable sources, reliable commentators, reliable researchers is very difficult because they will build their story of who is reliable even within the alternate media. So this is the background I wanted to give and this is regarding what we have discussed so far in the world and I want to just bring it now to the specifics of India which is very different precisely because we have this very decentralized framework and there is no centralization in the civilization itself. There is a very interesting interview by one of the rap singers from Punjab.

His name is Yo-Yo Honey Singh. So you can just search his name and he has done an interview called My Satanic Church Visit. It's on YouTube. He says how he went to London and he loved a particular kind of food which he had once tasted I think in Thailand, in one of the South East Asian countries and he loved that particular thing and he is invited by somebody to meet him at this restaurant. So he goes there and he is given, the entire restaurant is empty, he is alone with this person and he is given exactly that particular food which has been imported from the South East Asian country just for him, overnight import.

This man is shocked. He says, how do you even know this? And how do you manage to do this? And the person on the other side says, we have far more in terms of what we can give you. And then after the dinner, he is taken upstairs. Remember, this is a London, centre of London, Indian restaurant. He is taken upstairs and there is a secret room. The door is hidden. He is taken inside the secret room and there is a satanic church. He said he could feel the vibes there. It was immediately apparent. There was a palpable sense of the power involved.

And the person who had invited him said that we know that you have been tending towards this and we are inviting you to join us. If you join us, we will give you access to everything, all power and make your world famous and so on. So this man for whatever reason eventually chose not to do that. He came away, he was a little troubled and it was his Sikh faith which saved him. He came back to his Sikhism and that somehow the spiritual content saved him from this turn.

(0:24:16):

But he speaks about it quite openly. It gives an idea of how it works. In India somehow because of the decentralization, this kind of seizing of an entire system or civilization or religion has been practically impossible. But the occultism is there, it is fragmented, it is distributed, it is of various kinds and I will give two examples. I saw one very recently, although I had heard stories of these things. I saw one very interesting interview which was done with a former Chief Minister of India, Lalu Prasad Yadav and the interview had been put in public some 20 years ago, because he had spoken of Bharat and India and the difference between those two.

So because that was topical, it had been put out. So his morning routine was shown in the interview and he gets up, he is brushing his teeth with the wooden stick, with the traditional neem stick, then he goes to a pond of fish. Now he is vegetarian, why does he have a fish pond in the middle of Delhi, in his house? It's a large pond. And he throws food at the fish. And as they are eating, he chants loudly his command to the fish to go and destroy his enemies and bring back his rule in his state. And then he tells the fish, and if you don't do what I say, then I will kill all of you. Weird, okay.

Just by itself it's weird, but if you know what's behind it, then you understand the game. It's actually an occult thing and some of these people have, they use fish as part of their occult thing, because the fish represents a particular grade of vital consciousness, vital physical life force, not individualized mind. And they used the fish as an entry point to the collective consciousness in the people, in which to plug in and send suggestions or influences and so on. And that's what he was doing every day as part of his routine. So I'm giving this as an example because it's obvious, so visible.

And then there's another angle to it. I had been to Delhi once and a friend of mine who was at that time very much into these things had met many people who were part of this kind of circle and that's when he had made me go to one of the mind readers. It's an experience I've shared before. And then he took me to meet a guy who is an Aghori. Aghori, these are Tantrics who follow what is called the left hand path and they do a lot of rituals in the cremation ground and things like that. So I was not at all keen but my friend insisted. I said okay, why not let me just see what it's about. So I go to his place. He calls it an ashram. He's got pictures all around of him doing those rituals in the cremation ground and other things.

The man actually was very sweet and even kind and odd but that's about it, but kind. And through the interaction I asked him, what do you do all this for? What's the point of it? And I was trying to get to the meaning. And he says, no, well, that just gives you power. That's it. And it's his way of gaining power and growing in power. It was an end in itself. Then he was speaking of how politicians come to him to do rituals for him.

And especially during elections, he has to do certain rituals for them to win. I said, does it work? He said, yes, of course it works. How much do you charge? And he said, at that time, this must have been some 20, more than 20 years ago, maybe 25.  And he said, I charge 20 lakhs for one of the rituals. I didn't ask what the rituals were, but it was for the politician to win. So this is just an example of how these things, well, they do exist. They're of a very different kind, not so well organized, and yet the collectivity, the community itself of interests is just as well organized as anywhere else. It's just that the occultism is more diluted.

And I want to finally end this part of the discussion with how the media has been hijacked, especially through the internet, the big tech media, by creation of what seems to us to be competition, but the competition is fake. If all of you would remember, Google had this huge advantage. Facebook was nothing when they started. Google had Orkut which just in India had more followers than anything Facebook could have in its first few years. All Google had to do was push Orkut. They would have won face down. Facebook would never have existed and at that time they shut down Orkut, forced everybody to migrate to Facebook.

And you have to ask yourself why? And then suddenly Facebook became a big thing and it became a monopoly. So you have to understand that behind the scenes, the people who, let's say, pull the strings of these actors on the surface, the people we see, they pulled the strings and decided, okay, we need to create this as the monopoly. They invested heavily and then withdrew all others, forced the monopoly to become a global success and so earned money.

And the Facebook stock shot up and they were already holding it, among other things. And of course, Facebook, as you know, was controlled. It's owned by DARPA, that's the military agency. And I told you how they shut down LifeLog and started Facebook on the very same day and the same team transferred into Facebook. So there is a military and a cabal military interest behind many of these and their competition or any appearance of competition is just an appearance to keep us sleeping.

(0:29:56):

So this is the reason why you will never find these kinds of discussions openly integrated within any kind of media or if it is there it will be warped, twisted in some way so as to be able to discredit at some point. So this is the background I wanted to complete from last time's discussion and I would give as a general indication how do you know that the media is lying to you. You must understand the media, mainstream media as it is today, is on the large part controlled, but they have to build trust. So they will give you a lot of content which builds trust and at some point when it comes to the critical things, the strings get pulled and they will give you the distorted version.

And so you have built a certain loyalty to a certain source, you have built trust over years and then on this point alone they have deliberately warped and you cannot say why is it warped here. So there are certain patterns you will see and I just made a list of a few points:

First, when you find a politician making stupid decisions as if they are bumbling, as if they are idiots and so stupid that even you and I could think better than them, do not believe that, that is an appearance. They will dismiss their behavior as a mistake. So, for example, suddenly Canada has announced that so and so a person was killed by Indian agents. Where is the evidence? None so far, except hearsay, oh!we have given we were given evidence by the U.S five eyes show the evidence none so far.

India asked for the evidence, nothing so far. What was known within India at least, quite openly, was that within Canada, because many of these religious groups from Punjab there, were in a conflict for power. There was a power struggle and there were assassinations. And what is interesting is within a day or two of this accusation that Indian forces were behind it, one more person was gunned down. And now you see the media highlighted this one story but did not point out that the other person was gunned down in the same gang war. You say, Aha! And the fact that the accusation is made as if the man is, the Prime Minister of the country is foolish, no they are not. It is very calculated and the calculation goes very deep and it will come to something which we will discuss later of what's happening over the next one and a half years. And in this case it is targeting straight Modi, to blame Modi somehow.

The second indication is when the media takes up a pompous moral stance. They don't have morality; they don't live for morals. But when they stake a moral stance you can be sure that there is a coverup for something else and start questioning.

Third, when they claim, either the media or the politicians, and I think it applies to both, everything I am saying: When they claim it is for your own good, for your safety or for your protection, they don’t care for you. If they did, then they wouldn't be doing the things they are doing. So when they speak of your safety, you should do for your own good, you can be sure there's another agenda, which is for their good.

Fourth, when they ask you to suffer or sacrifice for the good of others, for the family or for the nation. You can be sure they have a different agenda.

So you will see for example during the When they wanted to push the vaccines, they would say, oh you should. First they said you should do it for yourself, many people didn't, so then they said you should do it for your family members, to protect them; for their good you should sacrifice.  It was interesting! How that was played also and the effect it had.

(0:33:48):

Next, when you find the media completely ignores the legislation or a portion of it that is being passed rapidly by the government and you don't know until it is done. I will give an example of this when the September 11th event took place and the Twin Towers were brought down in New York. Within five days the then Bush government passed the Homeland Security Act,  I believe, and it was a 5000 page document.

You cannot build a 5000 page document which is comprehensive and thought out and well structured in, well at least you had 4 days, you can't even say 5 days, 5 days after the event. It had been prepared way back, it had taken its time in preparation and they were waiting for, you remember what was discussed by Rumsfeld a few years before, Pearl Harbor type event to get the acquiescence of the American public. Once they had that, well the thing was rammed through. And everybody in the media said, Oh for our protection. They used fear for our protection. Nobody bothered to read it. Even within Congress you didn't have time to read a 5000 page document to question it. For your protection, end the panic and it's passed through and then you know they're playing a game they're fooling you.

Another indication is when the entire media gangs up against somebody or something and ignores everything else at that point then you know that this operation Mockingbird is active and there's an attempt to hypnotize, to push the public, to distract you from something else or whatever the agenda. Whenever they speak with one voice on a single issue across the aisles, across parties, even enemies come together and speak on one voice, then you know there is something which is going wrong.

So for example in the United States when it came to Ukraine, both sides of the aisles, even those who claimed to be against war, they said no this is necessary and sent all the money required. And if you look at the numbers actually, the amount of money that's been pumped, it's humongous and it is a huge scandal. Nobody questions it. And then you know that there's a game being played. They pass the legislation in such urgency that no one has time to read it. Again that's a sign. It's being pushed through. And inside the legislation they'll put many different elements which nobody will see until it's too late. And they will pass money to themselves and so on.

I remember it was sometime maybe a year or two ago when they had this problem of not having enough funds and then they had to pass through. There was a lock, deadlock between the two parties in the United States and at the last minute they pass through a legislation which permitted the government to borrow more money. With that there was a few, I don't remember, 2000 pages of material which were pushed in for the financial allocation. Among them was something like 250 million dollars for gender sensitization in Pakistan. Do you really think Pakistan will allow gender sensitization training to be given to an extreme Islamic religious people.  Rather it was the cover money for funding their other programs, the secret military projects or just bribing people. That's 250 million dollars and a cover of any kind is made. Nobody tracks it. Nobody goes to check how the money was actually used and all these are just passed like that. Legislation is passed overnight. No one has time to read 2000 pages. That's it. A couple of people who did read some of them raised voices. Media didn't speak about it at all.

And the last indication you will see, whenever the media prevents you from criticizing someone or it labels somebody or a criticism as ex-phobic or hate speech etc. If you recall all of us I think would have grown up at a time as children when we were taught that freedom of speech was sacrosanct. The famous statement of Victor Hugo that, ‘I may disagree with you but I will defend to my death your right to speak freely.’ That used to be the standard. Today it's all been removed. The only thing you are told is do not do hate speech. But hate speech is such a generic term, anything you say with force can be turned into hate speech. Not only that, the matter has been made so subjective that you're afraid to speak anything because now there is something they have  defined called microaggression.

That is, you may be polite, but in your voice, in your tonality, in your minute twitches of muscles or facial expression is an aggression and that the person finds themselves too sensitive to bear. And microaggression is precisely one that you yourself are not conscious of. And you can be accused of that and accused of hate speech. It gets into a domain where you're just afraid to speak up and just say yes to everything. And this is the part of the programming to get you to confirm to live by an automated so this is the  discussion I wanted to complete with regard to this.         
There are other issues regarding financial controls and all that which we will take up as we go along. So at this point I want to pause and look at some of the questions which have been holding back for a while.

Narad, please feel free to bring in whatever you want to comment on as well as share your views.

Alina(0:39:46):
We have some comments that we received from Chris: “I would like to have your thoughts on my two observations. First, over the years of studying the globalist conspiracy, I think the Asura is trying to imitate the new Supramental being and world with technological and other means. He is trying to hijack the true aspiration of the psychic being towards him and his false technological new world.”

And the second observation: “With all the mainstream denunciation information, which is very useful for waking up people who are still asleep, and which I think are the most are  controlled opposition. I have the feeling that the elite are exposing this information about themselves so that the population loses all confidence in them and can make way for the coming of the false saviour.”

(0:40:57)

Yes, there is a point to everything that Chris has mentioned. Things of course are always a little more complex, but wherever there is any positive tendency, idealism or truth, it is easily possible for the mind, for the intellect, to catch the form of it and then pervert the meaning of it, pervert the spirit of it. And so easy to do that there is nothing which is not open to perversion in principle. And the only thing which can prevent this is a deeper discrimination within us, which comes from the psychic influence or the spiritual intuition. And when we have that, we detect something, but we can't always identify even the nature and form of the perversion, but eventually of course it will be exposed.

But this being the case, every truth as it is glimpsed, and it is glimpsed in the subtle worlds well before even in the physical, the asuric tendencies will try to capture, co-opt and own it. So this happens even in the Ashram, when so many beings who were, as we saw earlier, instruments of the Asuras, the Mother brought here even, and to try to prevent them from doing damage in the world was one of the reasons, the other was to convert them, to convert their allegiance. But in the process what you saw also was certain ideals which they found very attractive coming to, and they try to seize and then warp and play with this and this will happen inevitably.

And so, the moment a truth is made popular, you can be sure there will be a dilution of it or a perversion of it. So, if you, Sri Aurobindo warns of this in the foundations of Indian culture, he says while the principles of these deeper truths of the culture need to be spread so that humanity can awaken to these principles. He also says, be careful not to spread them too soon, because then the other side will actually seize upon these, warp them, own them and distort them. And we see this happening even for something as simple as yoga. There is a whole angle to pervert and distort even the yogic principles, practices, forms, truths, teachings by taking those words and then giving them a totally different meaning.

So even the word ‘Yoga’ itself, from being a spiritual union with the divine has now been reduced to just physical exercises for health. And that's one of the perversions, but there are many others. So yes, it will happen, there will always be this attempt to hijack. And there's nothing we can do about it, that's the nature of reality. What we can do is awaken to this discrimination and where we have an influence, speak up, articulate, make the distinctions. And it can be done in a way which is non-confrontational. If you are worried about that, you can say, look, this is how it is originally. These people are using it with a different sense. That's all. Or they have misunderstood or are misrepresenting or different usage of the same word. Leave it at that but speak, bring clarity wherever you can.

The second point is about the mainstream media raising some of these issues you have to understand they cannot always ignore. There is a point where they see that you cannot ignore, to ignore further would expose their own complicity. So then they take up the issue and then trivialize it. Or they make it seem like, oh, it was one exception, but hide from you the fact that it's actually extensive. And so, yes, people do wake up and everyone knows that is inevitable, you can only hold off so much. But what you can do is as they wake up, you can distract their attention with something else or sow seeds of doubt or put them back to sleep using something else.

So take for example what happened with Epstein's logs because we mentioned that last time and the list. At the time when Epstein was made to commit suicide or killed while in jail. These were headlines. Everybody was aware of what it was about. Not everybody knew the full scope of it. And then today, nobody thinks about it. And that's because human memory on the public level is so shallow, so short, so brief, that we can be distracted by some excitation.

When G20 became so successful in india, it really left an impact on the whole world because it was the first time a G20, compared even to G7 even, had been so well organized and the content of it was so powerful, so impactful, so effective, well thought out, that there had to be a major distraction now to sully India's image. And that came with this accusation and the media immediately turned attention to these negative messaging and the positive image was completely covered up. And then you know, ah yes, there is an operation going on for changing, modifying the public perception of India.

(0:46:28):
So, yes, there is a degree of information that they cannot prevent exposure from, but what they can do is to cover truth with truth by distracting you with something else or outright distract with something which is irrelevant and make you forget. It's so easy to do because the culture of thinking is somehow so weakened and this goes back to education. If we had been taught to think for ourselves instead of merely rote repeating, the game would have been very different. I saw recently an advertisement that came with somebody pushing for brushing your teeth and they were saying that according to so and so criterion offered by some medical system, you should brush for so many minutes and the average person in India brushes only so many seconds and then they started making a joke about it and then basically pushing you to brush for so many minutes.

The first question you should ask: why so many minutes? Why for example if it's four minutes, why four minutes? Why not three and a half? What is the rationale? Was it based on a study? No it was not. It was based on how fast you want the brushes to get worn out for the business to sell you more brushes. In fact, if you look at the medical content of brushing, tooth brushing, they say on a particular part of the surface of the teeth it should not be more than 10 to 15 seconds. Now this is actually text of some medical research. What's being spread is totally different. On what basis and who thinks? Nobody thinks. So it's so easy to deceive the masses because we don't think and so it has to be part of our culture to question and then to counter question and to ask why is this messaging being given so strongly and until this thought process comes in you are always vulnerable to being distracted or deceived.

I think we can go to the next question.

Alina (0:48:34):
Under the nickname PMRP: “What will be the role of aliens and UFOs in shaping the humanity and bringing the true light of consciousness?” And we have a related question from Mahesh: “The last four talks on the current affairs have been absolutely fascinating. It's been an eye-opener about the agenda of the dark forces in the world today. I'm writing to bring to your attention another angle to the whole situation which is extra planetary, so to say. I suggest two documentary movies, The Cosmic Secret and Above Majestic by David Wilcock and Corey Gould. This gives an overview of the extraplanetary connections to all that has happened on Earth over the past three thousand nine years and how humanity has been misled about every aspect of life and subdued by the global elites in order to control us.”

Sraddhalu (0:49:47):

So both questions relate to the influence of extraterrestrials in this whole situation on Earth. My simple answer to that would be if on Earth there can be instruments for both light and dark. Yes, on all other planets also there will be such. And there would be civilizations which are more aligned to the light or more aligned to the dark or just self-interest, not concerned about light or dark, which effectively makes it gray but darkish naturally. And it is a fact that going back several thousand years, maybe even a few million years, Earth is being visited by other civilizations. It's a fact. It's also a fact that they have intervened in Earth affairs in various ways. They have also taken advantage of things from the Earth to intervene in their affairs and so on.

The Earth as a planet is unusual as it seems from many of the statements of extraterrestrials supposedly to human beings saying that there's a certain richness of diversity and something distinctive about the earth which they don't find on their planet. They are fascinated by the things here and so on. And there is a certain plasticity to the human genome which is also unusual, which many of them find interesting. So I have recently received this document which is called ‘A Year long stay on ET bays’. This is by a French man called Roro is the term, Robert L. So, Robert and so they named him Roro and he was a French farmer in 1969. He was approached by some ETs and they said they wanted a sample of his genes because their genes, they were going through some genetic issues and they wanted to take some good genes and they found his to be the right type. They made a deal with him. They needed him for one year to fertilize some of their women and he was taken to a base in the Himalayas and he describes what happened there.

Now what is interesting, the reason why I would give credibility to this was, he was a complete uneducated farmer with absolutely no training or background. And then people who met him after that found him being able to say technical things with precision which he could not have got otherwise. But also the nature of what he describes is so accurate and so interesting. So this is a document which actually was originally in French. It's been translated into English. And I will be putting this up with a link for next time, so that you can all download it. It's meant for distribution. It's interesting for some of the insights it gives. But this is an example of how they take advantage of the earth genes and also seed some of the earth genes to try to see what they can do to improve.

And I know of cases where people who recall as children, they were taken about ET crafts and given certain interventions. And they remembered what kind of interventions it was and subsequently even met with those people and recognized them in their adult life. And to this day, they had certain marks from those interventions. And apparently, it was done to enhance certain qualities or capacities. And as it seems in that particular family, it happened through three generations. So there are such attempts to intervene genetically also to make experiments, as would any slightly more advanced species do with a less advanced species as we do with the lab rats equally.

So yes, all these things do exist. They do take place. The problem of course is reliability of knowledge and claims So in these two Documentaries, there's a lot of truth There's also some exaggeration probably of some kind because eventually that's the nature of the human mind. David Wilcock has done excellent work of research in his early books. In more recent books, he has relied almost entirely on the testimony of a few individuals, which I personally think are not reliable. Corey Good also makes certain statements which I find entirely unreliable. They are not rational, they are not technically sound and they internally contradict. So to me, that's very simple. Whether I believe them comes next. If you have these issues then there is a problem. So I would be careful about specifics but the broad line, the fact that there have been interventions, yes that's true.

Is there an intervention going now? Yes. We discussed this once in one of the discussions with Narad that there was a time when in the 1960s at the height of the Cold War, a UFO appeared on the US base, one of the military bases which had these missiles which could knock out an entire continent each. The UFO came and all the lights on the base shut down. Nothing would function, all their machines were jammed. The UFO stayed there for 20 minutes. Eventually it left and it moved very slowly across the ground where there were the missile silos. It left after 20 minutes, all the lights came on and when they looked inside the missiles, the computer chip in the missile silos had been fused. And at that time they thought first it might be a Russian attack. So it went all the way up the chain and the hotline was raised to the other side. From the Russian side came a similar report that on their bases a UFO had come and done something exactly the same. So it's as if some extraterrestrial entity had intervened on both sides and said we can prevent you from doing this and warning people not to push the technology to a point where it could destroy humanity.

Sraddhalu (0:55:36):

So yes that also exists. There are positive interventions, there would be negative interventions. At the end of the day, it's a play of consciousness. Does it matter whether somebody in your country was born in your country or has come as an immigrant, illegal or legal? And an extraterrestrial for me is just another immigrant from a different planet. Nothing fundamentally different, isn't it? Yes, there could be other differences of extreme culturally and even sometimes in the framework of mind and so on. But eventually it's a human, it's a living being and the issues are exactly the same. So for me the question of extraterrestrial intervention is only limited to technological superiority, but in consciousness terms, it makes no difference. So in technological superiority perhaps they could intervene and perhaps even prevent a nuclear war at that time when the danger was there or even now if it could happen in Ukraine or over Ukraine. But otherwise in consciousness terms it changes nothing in terms of their understanding.

You can go to the next question

Alina (0:56:52):
Maureen, he addressed a question, “Could you cite these books, the one I know is Transformation of America?”

Sraddhalu (0:57:01):
Yes, last time I was giving examples of some cases of MK Ultra victims who came out to speak and I said these things were documented in detail in books. Maureen mentions one book that she knows which is called the transformation of America. So actually the title of the book is a play on the word trans-formation. By putting into trans you form the mindset, you form the people, you form the thinking process. So ‘trans’formation and it's about Katie O'Brien, I believe who was one of the victims who came out very openly. There are interviews with her, I think still you will find them on YouTube. And it's a book, if you really want to go deep dive into the nature of the MK Ultra programs and how people were used under it or misused, it can be a bit shocking, a bit disturbing, but you may consider that. There is another book though, the one which I was referring to has a different name. It was in fact the first book that I saw of this kind and that was called ‘The Control of Candy Jones’. Candy Jones was this American actress. The book is now republished in a new edition with some additions which is now and it's called now ‘The CIA's Control of Candy Jones’.

So both, this book as well as the transformation of America, the true story of a CIA mind-controlled slave, 1995. Both of these I have put as links in the description of today's session. You could take a look at that. The links are for the Indian site on Amazon, but you might find it in the US Amazon, perhaps much cheaper if you want to get into it. But I warn you, these are somewhat gory descriptions, but technically largely sound. There's also a lot of documentation about the accusations they made, which have been documented. A lot of historical events have been documented. The whole thing has gone to court. They have spoken about in various forums, which have legal implications. And to this day, none of the people accused have come forward to contradict their statements. And the reason is if they do come forward, then they will have them to expose themselves to the specifics of the claims made and they do not do that. So, they simply keep quiet and ignore. You can look at that or simply read the reviews of these books, which are also pretty good in the links that I have given. Read the reviews and you will get an idea of what these are about. And there are a few others by the same authors. You can follow up with those if it interests you.

We can go to the next question.

Alina (0:59:42):
Rajesh is writing, “Osho literally mentioned mind is the enemy as mind is outer influence not ours”.

Sraddhalu(0:59:59):
So this was a comment Rajesh made. Yes, last time when I was saying that we have to follow that which is our deepest truth which is in the psychic being and not follow what comes from outside as a programming. But how do you distinguish? And so Rajesh's comment that Osho said mind is the enemy because mind is an outer influence and not ours. So perhaps in the framework of Osho's teaching this might be valid because he was half a Buddhist as you know and for the Buddhist framework the mind has to be killed in order to get to the Nirvana which is a dissolution of the mind itself among other things.

But Sri Aurobindo's approach would be different and this is important to highlight. For us the mind is an instrument to be perfected. Yes currently it is an instrument of ignorance, currently it has all kinds of limitations, it has a tendency to exaggerate, it is erroneous all the time, limiting and so on. But rather than saying mind is your enemy, the better approach might be to say refine the mind, train your mind, make it your friend as a provisional instrument of discrimination through which a higher influence or a deeper psychic influence can act to either perceive or to articulate what it perceives.

So perfecting the mind would be a better approach than treating it as an enemy and discarding it because if you do that, then you have nothing left and you can't say I have a deeper spiritual discrimination. Mind is there to help you to even cut through the errors of your early stage distorted intuitions. Nobody gets an intuition directly the first time. Always the intuitions pass through so many layers that inevitably it is mixed and distorted. And your own mind is your tool to help in discriminating what is the pure intuition and what is not, at least in the beginning. Eventually the intuition itself brings its own discriminating power, but initially it is the mind which is your friend. So I would suggest you change the approach and say, I will train the mind, make it more robust, more insightful, intuitivise it, open it to a deeper guidance, but it is a vehicle to be used, an instrument to be used, to be perfected.

Narad if you want to say anything feel free to join in at this point.

Narad (1:02:30):
Well I have a very dear friend who has seen in an institution that we know very well of the most horrible examples of abuse to children and had to take his child away from that place. How is it possible to change that place and not become a martyr? Or does one have to take a stand against these evil beings who have so much power?

Sraddhalu (1:03:25):
It depends on your capacity. Some people are built to be warriors and even they may have to take a strategic retreat to be able to live to fight another day. A premature exposure to a power that is too well organized might even compromise your ability to be able to expose the falsehood. So a lot depends on the individual and the circumstances that they're against and their own capacity to face it. At the very least I would simply say survive to fight another day. If you can expose without compromising your survival, then do what is possible and take small steps. If through these small steps a larger collective awakening can take place, the same effort now would be massively multiplied. Many more people would come forward, many more people would be able to act and then those powers would be able to do not much. They will still fight back but not as powerfully.

So this is one of the points I wanted to make regarding Chris's question also when he says that they want to make the population lose all confidence in them and make way for a saviour. Actually the game goes two ways. They want to make the population lose all confidence in themselves and in their ability to face this well-organized evil. So we will say, we are helpless, the evil is too strong, best is to ignore it and not do anything. That's one agenda.

First this is what they try. If for some reason it does not work and people say, no, we are going to fight it. That's when they will play the other game. They'll swing it to the other extreme and say that now people hate the government, you hate the police and so defund the police, throw out the government and go for an extreme chaos and maybe prop up a false leader who will now stand for this extreme chaos and break everything.

And so this is the game in which you will see the media is currently swinging. So much of the propaganda you will see in the cinema. They repeatedly say this in all the new science fiction movies. They will tell you it takes funds to build a civilization, you need funds to destroy something which is corrupt or perverse. So, the idea that you have to organize a destruction of civilization is being seeded everywhere in the young minds. And at some point you will have these individuals who will be propped up as the leaders and of course they are all controlled and they lead you into this.

One of these which is already happening is this young person who was made to speak, young girl who was made to speak in the UN meeting, where she makes these abusive comments to all the heads of State and then they all give her a standing ovation. The whole thing was orchestrated. She is part of a family which has a background of cinema and acting and funding for these things. They have raised huge amount of funds behind to make this game. You cannot get permission even to visit a UN facility, much less give a speech to heads of State, unless the whole thing has been already pre-planned, the entire content and response has been pre-planned and its subsequent follow-up. Now to prop her up as a potential youth leader. And under her name they have created something called, I think there is a group called Extinction, something with extinction, forget the exact term. But a group supposedly fighting for the environment and they will do all kinds of crazy things. They will tape their hands with glue on famous paintings and all kinds of things like that. If you think about what they do, if you think about the ideology being pushed and the solutions offered, they are basically destructive. There is nothing constructive. And then you say, ah yes, these are the false saviours and they are propped up, it's controlled opposition.

So I am coming back to Naraad, your comment, we have to be very careful because any strong organized effort can easily be swayed unless we have this discrimination but I would say at the very least such a person should put it out there and say this is what happened  and I warn others and you go at your own peril with this group.

(1:08:06):
So I want to now take on the theme for today which I have titled the disruptors. So after seeing all this what we have said it's quite a dark perspective. Is there any hope? Are things happening? Obviously things have to be there because there is the light equally which is fighting, which is working. So what is this? Are we seeing signs of it? And that's why I keep saying the next one and a half years are so critical.

There are disruptors, individuals who either consciously or unconsciously are vehicles for the light. Sometimes they are unconscious and in which case they may also be mixed. Sometimes they will do right, sometimes wrong. But where they are conscious, the errors would be far less. And the problem though is because of the entrenched system, for anybody with some light to come up the chain and enter a point where they can actually leverage and disrupt the system means that they should have been able to deceive the system itself to get into that position. That's not easy. So it can happen two ways. One is somebody who deliberately deceives the system and gets in, which requires a lot of skill and it requires as much organizational skill as the system has. And we will see an example of that also. And or it requires somebody who was part of that system, went up the chain and at some point awoke to the falsehood and perversion of it and his own psychic influence came forward and a decision was made to change the game. So Ronald Bernard, of whom we have had so much reference before, is one such. At some point, he broke out of that system. He cannot fight it, he is not strong enough. But there are others who might be able to do that and will become then agents for a change, for a disruption

Now I'm going to be taking names and one of the dangers of the names is inevitably these names have been vilified no end by the media. Sometimes the programming is so deep that the moment you hear the name you will have a reaction. So I'm going to put you through an exercise. The first thing you do, think of somebody, some politician that you really hate. You'd like them to be locked up, you'd like them to be hurt, to be tortured, to be whatever. Think of one name, doesn't matter who. And now, in your own mind, describe what are all the things that you will criticize the person for. Let's take a few seconds, very briefly, point 1, point 2, point 3, point 4. Why do you dislike the person and what has the person done wrong? And so in many cases you will find you dislike the person almost with a visceral hatred, but you can't list all the things they have done wrong. Or when you objectify the things that you think they have done wrong, you'll find they're quite trivial compared to so many others whom you don't hate so strongly.

And if that's the case, especially when the hatred is visceral, be sure this is the result of the media hypnosis programming. And if that is the case now, you should be willing to say, all right, I'm going to review this. And now take the same person and make a list of three things that the person has done right or that you can appreciate about them. Point one, point two, point three. If you can't sit down with the paper later and do it. But this is just a very simple exercise to expose where a very strong emotional reaction can be easily exposed for what it is because you cannot give reasons to justify that extreme reaction and then you know this is programming.

And it is very hard for us to recognize that we have been programmed or that my emotions, my dear hatred for X is actually a post-hypnotic suggestion. Well, this is how it is going to be. So, I am going to take names and the first name iam going to take now. I am going to name  one two three four five at least  four of them are global disruptors, fifth potentially global disruptor. So, and there are many others, but they are not as powerful as these four at least.

So the first one I am going to name is Elon Musk. He is a fascinating case. And just now there is a biography that has come out. It's sold in record numbers, real sales, not the fake sales that you see of many other famous personalities. But in that biography, you see certain elements he describes as a child. He was sent in some camp for elite children. And at the age of 12, he had to survive and not die in a wild part of the forest. So all the children were given a certain amount of food and certain tools and they were set free for several days they had to survive. And they were allowed to steal from each other, beat each other up or as they were told, several of them had died in the past because they made mistakes.

And what was the mistake? To trust others. So they were taught to distrust others, to fight for their survival and to fight against all others for their own sake. And so he says he grew up with that training, knowing it could mean your death if you trusted others. He grew up with that training to trust no one and fight for himself. And this is an example of how the elite breed their children for this kind of a sociopathic frame in which they can rule the machinery that has been created. We discussed that last time. And he comes at that time he was very weak, he would be bullied by others, but as he grew he built up a very strong powerful personality. Extreme intelligence, that's again a selective breeding program for high intelligence, high vitality and if he had a choice he would have just been into programming but because of the strong vitality he expands rapidly, seizes upon the wealth power because he has that capability.

Now all of this would have made him effective had he gone into the dark side. But for some reason he makes this course correction and now turns to a different side and thats what makes him so powerful as an instrument. He has the capability of that side and the organisation of that side and the intelligence and the vitality to seize upon money, wealth, power also, which most people with weak vital cannot and yet he turns upon the whole situation and brings it to do good. Now this good, whatever may be his conception and you can criticize him all you want as a person.

(1:15:10):
At the end of the day, we have to assess these names and I will name others, assess them by their actions and not by their statements, not by their appearance, not by how they speak or what they speak.

We had for example a very wonderful US President as Obama who spoke beautiful things and a charming smile but if you look at the eight years, what did he do? I've asked this question to many people. Most people cannot say anything that he did good. Or what you saw during those 8 years was the rise of ISIS, you saw the weakening of the US economy until the entire military was collapsing, the planes were collapsing, the ships were collapsing, and the entire industrial base was gone, it was all transferred to China, all that happened during his rule.

And at the end of his rule he says that there is no way the economy can recover, we have to just accept that this is going to be the future. And within two years the economy was reversed later when Trump came to power. But what he did to get the economy back on power was violently criticized because in the process he also started reversing Obama's policies which were meant to protect the environment. So what happened there? In fact, this is something which we will touch upon perhaps later in more detail, the very policies put in place by Obama had become the stranglehold on business.

For example, if you had a stream of water passing through your land when it rained, when technically it was a stream which could not be blocked and you could have no development in the part where the water flowed. The problem was the definition of the stream of water was left unclear. So you had to hire a consultant who would do an analysis of several weeks, months, through the year perhaps if needed because they had to show that in the year during these seasons you had water flow, charge you heavily for it and then tell you where you could build and where you could not.  This would go to the government and the government would look at the analysis and still dispute it because the terms were not clear. Now this happened under Obama's rule. Maybe he is not involved. That's not the point. It happened during that rule and the result was all development came to a halt.

When Trump came to power, the first thing he did was if it is seasonal, he said the water does not count. The definitions were made clear; immediately construction, building industry started. Very simple. We will see other things which happen also under him. You could say incompetence on one side or you could say there was a deliberate agenda. Right now, it's not important. What is important is the end result. The end result was a collapse in the industry and A transfer to China while China grew, the US industries collapsed. US was pushed into debt. The military had weakened to a point where planes were crashing and ships were breaking. And so something had to be done. So I'm saying it's not enough that a politician smiles or speaks nice words. Finally what matters is actions.

Elon Musk is not a nice person according to some. I've met people who interacted with him and they said he's extremely brash, extremely arrogant. But for what he does, it doesn't matter, maybe it's even necessary. And I wouldn't care because I'm more concerned with what he achieved with his brashness and arrogance and if he could do what he did, it's amazing. And what did he do and why am I putting him on that level? So single-handedly, he has built at least five disruptive industries. Now this is not normal. A businessman builds a single industry which disrupts the world. For example, Steve Jobs for the iPhone which later became generalized to the mobile phone. And before that the Apple computer which again redefined the whole personal computing space. Maybe two disruptive things but the two were in the same domain of expertise. Here is a man who comes and makes the disruptive industries in five different domains, just like that. And you can't do that unless you have an EXTRAORDINARY power behind. Now in this case, there is a tremendous vital power as well as a tremendous power of intellect, very high intelligence. He has supposedly Aspergers syndrome, which is a sign often of or rather which many intelligent people have but again that in itself means nothing. We know of many (with) Aspergers syndrome who just wrote equations on paper and published papers, did nothing that changed the world.

Here is somebody who is dynamically acting to disrupt the world's industries. Now particularly I am going to point to three which are going to for the future going to be of extreme importance and for the next few years. The first of these is his purchase of Twitter, which he freed from the cabal control, you know. Just before that you saw everywhere there was massive censorship which had become hardened during the COVID lockdowns to a degree that everybody was afraid to speak. I would not even have dared to speak what I'm speaking now. But by purchasing Twitter, first he exposed the mischief which was being done by the big tech media in interfering in elections, in influencing people, in manipulating opinions and so on, which is the public programming and the hypnosis for which they are used, and the censorship. And he has freed it from the censorship.

And he exposed all this in what are called the Twitter files, which mainstream media did not cover at all. Do look at those, you will understand how deeply entrenched the different institutions were, the government with the big tech media and finances, banks, etc. How deeply entrenched they were to control and suppress human free speech and human thought.

(1:21:09):

By creating a space now where actually you are not afraid of speaking up, it's given a chance for people to actually put out opinions and put out data, the kind of which we have been discussing now. So I would highly encourage for those of you who would like to study these things in more detail or explore, well get on that platform and you will find a lot of people putting out material, then use your discrimination. And what is interesting is when you actually have a platform with real free speech, if somebody makes a false claim, you can have others who can counter-claim or expose and say, no, but you're wrong on this point. So, there's a self-correcting mechanism. And in fact, the White House had made a claim about economic development and somebody on Twitter pointed out, put it in context and White House withdrew that false claim. And that's the kind of power a single person can have. I mean, this was the person who made the counter-claim on a platform which is truly free, but sufficiently controlled that you do not have mischief potential.

So there are other platforms such as what used to be 4chan, then 8chan and 8kun, which are a free for all, which is so full of junk that one gets sick hanging around there for more than a while. This is a clean platform and of course there is a degree of monitoring needed to ensure that it retains that level of cleanliness. But you saw the moment he took charge and made it free, all the other media companies boycotted up to a point. And he had to find his own way to build resources financially and make it viable. He fired three-fourths of the workers and still brought about a change in the platform, improved the level of coding and usability just like that within a few months, which you did not see going back many years.  And what he has done now by bringing the video facilities, he is rivaling YouTube and so on. There is real competition for the first time in what was otherwise totally controlled big tech media. So this is one and this is going to be extremely important in the immediate future because now people can speak freely and expose things and you can educate yourself by exchanging ideas.

The second thing which he disrupted majorly was putting the Starlink internet. Now this is a series which eventually will become many thousand little satellites surrounding the earth, which give you internet from space, reaching everywhere on earth, not dependent on any government, not dependent on any wiring system, cables, fibers. Now as the internet is today and there was a research going back 20 years that showed the vulnerability of the internet. If you could hit seven points and just seven computers in the world, you could bring down the entire global internet. That was the level of vulnerability built into the design. Actually the internet was designed using the US military system to survive a nuclear attack. It's supposed to be totally decentralized. But in the very structure of implementation, they made it such they were these control points where they can choke everything. But the reason for that was to be able to monitor everything. But when this was exposed, the research itself was classified because they didn't want terrorists to know what those seven points are. But that was 20 years ago. It's the same thing today.

And if nothing else, there is a cable, an undersea fiber cable that comes to your country, chop that with a submarine and you won't know who has chopped it and your entire country could go dark on the internet. Except you have Starlink which beams from space and nobody can stop it. It's so decentralized and it's practically hack-proof. He built that on his own and against the cabal interests. So, Twitter is against cabal interest by bringing free speech. Distribution of that free speech for Twitter or X as it is called now, through the internet has been freed from cabal control.

And the third thing, how do you put up those satellites? Because even the rockets to put them up had been destroyed. Under Obama, the entire space program had practically been shut down. And the only thing you were told was, and this was the goal Obama set for the space program, set up a base on Mars in 10 years. And that was now 15 years ago. Of course, nothing was done. It was just a way of dumping money and doing nothing because you cannot get to Mars with the existing technology, period. This is the reality. You have to travel at least six months and you have a rocket so large with so much food, it's not possible. You need a different technology to travel for that, which also will happen. It's already there. So that was one of those red herrings to distract the whole attention and keep something going. Meanwhile, the entire US capability of putting rockets in place had been shut down. So US was dependent on Russia to send rockets. So when they put astronauts in space, it was through a Russian rocket and everything was dependent on Russia.

What Elon Musk did was he built an entirely from scratch rocket industry in the US, superior to what NASA had built over 50 years and he built it in just 8 years. Reusable rockets. As a concept we were always told it was impossible, it was not economically viable. Elon Musk did it in just 8 years. And initially NASA resisted giving him the funds and there are many problems he bypassed. Each of them fought his way through against cabal controls and got to that point where he has built an independent industry where he is actually putting a rocket practically one every week. Some bigger, some smaller. Effectively it comes to about one every week. This use was the original program of the US space exploration going back in the 1960s. They wanted to put up one rocket every week, set up a space station, then set up a moon base and then explore the whole solar system. The whole thing had been shut down. Here Elon Musk has built that capability and now is speaking of setting up a moon base and Mars base and so on, to be seen.

(1:27:20):
But the capability has been built up in such a short time, it's amazing. Two other industries that he is working on, one which is called Neuralink, which will allow you to connect the brain to a chip. Now there are many people who are scared of that because the fear is that the chip will control your brain. But actually what happens when you do those experiments, it's a two-way connection. And in practice, the brain plasticity can override the chip, the chip is not so plastic. So while one can certainly influence, the interesting potential for this is that you could actually connect with the brain directly into a feed from the computer. Instead of the screen going through your eyes, it may go directly to the brain or commands from the brain may go directly. Again as a technology this already existed in the cabal secret programs just as in the space technology they have secret programs and so on.

But here is an open program in the industry which is doing something similar and it's very close. He has also worked on AI, general AI. He was part of this open chat GPT which later Microsoft bought out and so he separated. Now he is doing his own, which is a general AI which will not be woke. It's a question of another year before we see that. And finally here the boring company which makes tunnels, which is also a major disruptor. So all these are disruptive technologies which one man has actually built, all of them outside cabal control, and all of them going contrary to the one world government framework one way or other at least the first three are the most critical and not directly influencing politics but indirectly through free speech through open speech changing the very game of politics today so all of this will count for what we will discuss later when it comes to the question of elections of the next one and a half years.

So this is the first name I am taking. I will share a few more names next time, which also will be, I hope, somewhat surprising, but I hope also hope-giving. Just because of Elon Musk today, we can have free internet, which is outside cabal control, and free speech, which is outside cabal control. And that alone is like a major cut through this, what was otherwise a wall, allowing for some light, higher light to come through. So there are others and in his case he was one of those who seemed to be almost as if inside the system and turned around. The others have sneaked into the system and then played it and that was possible because of a certain sufficient awakening in the people who were backing. And this is also a positive sign that overall, generally speaking, the degree of awakening in the mass is far greater than it used to be before. And if this awakening can be not merely an intellectual awareness, but an actual turn to a deeper value system, and if possible, an awakening to the soul's presence and influence, that would set the stage for a real breakthrough, a revolution, a spiritual revolution.

But for that we are still very early and we have to start with ourselves and maybe those around us who can be influenced by us. Here I will bring it back to us as our first responsibility, not only what we do in our lives, in the change of consciousness within us, but if to the extent we can influence others around by a living example and where necessary by a few nudges of speech or action to spread that inspiration to help others also to turn to a deeper and higher potential, that would be our immediate work. To the extent we are able to do this, we are participating in this larger awakening.

(1:31:14):
The external enablers are what we are discussing. The underlying internal enablers, the grass root enablers are us. Those cannot do what they have to do without the support that we provide. When we provide the support, other disruptors also will rise from within the general masses. Anybody can be inspired by higher light and awaken to this possibility. And we take the example of Joan of Arc , a young girl, peasant, no training, suddenly takes a sword and leads an army. There are many potentially ready if they choose to give themselves with purity and sincerity  to the divine potential that is within. The miracle can happen and the divine inspiration can fill and act through you. You will recall the lines from Savitri…the three things, Narad, you can tell us? “the king idea” –  what are the three things?

Narad (1:32:26):
“…A prayer, a master act, a king idea
Can link man’s strength to a transcendent Force.

Then miracle is made the common rule,…”

Sraddhalu(1:32:51):
Can link man’s strength to a Transcendent Force and then the miracle happens. What are the three things? Prayer, a master act, a king idea. Of these three, the first is very much within our reach, maybe the second occasionally, but start with the first with sincerity and with a conscious self-giving, asking for the divine will to act through you and in you, without mixture. And the more transparent you can be, the most effective will be that action in you and through you. And such should be our effort. Let's concentrate in this aspiration altogether.

Namaste.

Alina(1:34:07):
Namaste. Thank you.