EWS #174 Current Affairs – III The Powers + Q&A

16 September 2023

Alina (0:00:21):
Namaste and welcome back to our continuing series, Evenings with Sraddhalu. Today we have a very great surprise, and I'm happy to greet Narad, who is online with us and to whom we really owe all this effort of creating this series. He started the Evenings with Sraddhalu back a few years ago, and we are very grateful that it's thanks to him we continue today the series.

Namaste, Narad!

Narad (0:00:56):
Namaste Alina!

Alina (0:01:00):
[laughing] I would like to say even more because Narad had introduced me on this path, and I, I owe to him most of my, my initial experience, initially, let's say, introduction to Mother and Sri Aurobindo.

Namaste Sraddhalu!

Sraddhalu (0:01:20):
[laughing] Namaste. And Namaste Narad! Welcome! We have been missing you for a very long time.

Narad (0:01:26):

Well, I tell you, it is more than an honour and a privilege to be back with you. It's a blessing! Namaste!

Sraddhalu (0:01:34):

It's a blessing for all of us to have you! And it has come..

Alina (0:01:40):

We feel the same [laughing].

Sraddhalu (0:01:43):

And Narad has joined us at a very special time when we have taken up this theme of “Current Affairs”. And it's interesting that for the last two sessions I had this very strong urge, and we have, I was missing very strongly Narad’s presence, and then suddenly things just fell into place, and he just came, and that's it, it's just happened. So, I'm very happy, and I just take it as a sign that  although we have taken up a theme which is, maybe even somewhat controversial, that it is important at this time and for reasons which will become clear as we develop the topic.

One of the reasons why I have also chosen to go somewhat in depth on the theme is because as you will see as we develop the topic: The next one and half years are going to be perhaps the most important in human history in terms of the decisive turn of events that will take place. The scope of this will become clear as we develop the theme. But for this reason I feel, it is necessary even that we go a little bit outside the zone of comfort and safety and take some of these questions and issues head-on.

I will still be careful not to always speak certain names, especially of issues which are very close, but I will give enough hints of what they refer to that most people would be able to follow and understand what it refers to. And also sometimes I will not go in-depth with evidence, I will just say, ‘this is how it is’ without backing it with the evidence, because doing that will digress from our primary focus. So this is just to put things in context for where we are.

To recapitulate, we had two sessions: The first of which was in #172, where we spoke of the crisis and the choice before us, which is “Truth or the abyss”^[1]. And Sri Aurobindo's observation that the civilisation as it is currently, obviously will not last, and it will be, it has to be replaced either by a new construction on the basis of a higher truth or through destruction which may be through crashing circumstances. And the Mother's guidance saying simply, “So, wake up and collaborate!”^[2] –very simple!

The second discussion we had, which was last time, I took the symbol of The Wall which Llewellyn saw, and it's a real thing, it is an actual object in the inner worlds. And the Mother's observation that there is “This wonderful world of delight waiting at our gates for our call, to come down upon the earth…”^[3], and she says, if only we would condescend to invite it.

And so our discussion was focused on the resistance and the mechanism, the framework, which has been built up by human beings to prevent this descent of the world of light, to delay the evolution, and the effort itself, as we saw, goes back a very long time, which is what Llewellyn also saw when he tried to trace back the source of The Wall, goes back almost as far back as human evolution.

(0:05:16):

But we discussed how it was built by the organising powers and control structures across millennia, because the powers which act behind the human interests do not have the same sense of time as we do, they live in very large spans of time, some are even cosmic, and so they have the patience, they have the means, and they can keep attempting even if something fails. And because they tap into human nature at its lowest levels of greed, desire, fear, and instincts, possessiveness, control, they have a grip inside the human being which uses these things and organises through these means.

On the other hand, the dimension of the spiritual light does not have the same grip, it is of course more deeply rooted in the very soul of all humanity, and therefore eventually it must triumph, but in between, until the human nature itself turns to the light, consciously, willingly, gives itself to the light, it does not have a grip on circumstances except through a few individuals, sometimes even incarnations or vibhutis of some kind who will help to make the shift or help the collective awakening.

The question of course we took last time was also – can we dismantle it? Can we become points for the reception of the light? And this is where we had paused.

Today's focus I want to take a little further, a little deeper and in a direction which will be somewhat surprising for many. It will go into a direction,—which if I do not provide sufficient evidence to back it,—may sound a little bit unexpected and therefore perhaps labelled ‘conspiracy’. But I can assure you, it comes from well-documented materials, and it's all there in the public domain, you only have to search for keywords, you will find all the material there. And so, I won't bother with the evidence, I will just go with the direction and the form in which things have moved.

You see last time we spoke of how in this organisation, through secret societies, the powers, which want to control humanity have seized upon, at a young age, the potential leaders of society. So people who are charismatic, people who are wealthy, people who are unusually intelligent or unusually skillful,—and all these are the means, they are so what we call ‘leaders of society’ or they become leaders of society or influencers,—catch them young, possess them, warp them and bring them within the control-structure, and in return give them all the benefits for a warped life and with the threat of death, if they ever break their oath, their promise, to submit to this system.

And we saw all this, we understand how that works. But: What's behind it all? What's at the root of it all? And where do you see that organisation? Because we cannot see the people who control these systems and these hierarchies, and we may even say, behind those people are the forces and sometimes Asuric forces which can incarnate just as Divine forces can incarnate.

But where are they based? We touched upon the banking interests, and we spoke of the BIS which is like the apex of the pyramid of banking; you have similarly military interests; commercial interests; business interests. And all these interests sometimes may be diverse, and yet at the top level, you find them integrated in a common round table where they work together. But still who controls that? And so today we will touch upon this. And it is not enough to just say, yes there are subtle-beings. That’s true. But they have also mechanism.

And so, for this purpose, we will go back about a 100 years first, and this is a period which is fascinating in human history. Let’s say, generally 1890 to 1910, 1920,—about 30 years: Sri Aurobindo at that time is just preparing, beginning to enter into the struggle for India's freedom, he has started the process, he started the movement, and as he is built it up to a certain crescendo, the British Government declares him “the most dangerous man in India”. One man, who is writing articles, is the most dangerous man in India!

(0:10:10):

And so, there is a whole, you can say: a power and a light, which is coming for India's awakening, which is intended for awakening of humanity. At the same time, you must understand, these are occult movements, spiritual movements, which are massive in scope. At the same time in Europe, there is a massive awakening, and a new hope and a new vision of possibilities, of a new step in evolution,—not always articulated in such words. But, because Europe is rooted in its spirituality in the mix of occult–spiritual domain, and a lot of the spiritual knowledge was held inside these secret societies, there is inevitably this occult-spiritual mix.

Now going back a few centuries, you will find, all the great artists, all the great thinkers, all the philosophers, all the scientists, used to be part of some secret society, or other, and typically part of the Freemasons. Why? Because that was the original intent of the Freemason-movement to pick the most highest potential of leadership in humanity and give them that culturing, that nourishment, and a spiritual turn, so that they could reach their highest epics and give them the support by means to be able to achieve their highest potential. This was the original intent, at least as far as we understand.

But the moment you have a secret society and it had to protect from the church and political interests which were extremely dark, suppressing all knowledge, suppressing all spiritual awakening, or evolution, the moment you have to have a secret society to protect against all that, the secrecy itself made the societies vulnerable to hijacking by others. So you could have in the lower levels the same ideals, but as you went up, if the top levels were hijacked, it could easily warp into a completely different direction.

And these are the most dangerous, because they have the appearance of the surface of light and then the dark behind which hides behind the light and manipulates. So what happened is, in the 1810’s let’s say, 1890’s let’s say, uh, while this enormous pressure of an awakening is coming and with Sri Aurobindo's Presence on earth it builds really intensely, all these societies wake up and say, ‘Wow, we feel this imminent’, and the possibility of this new step is felt as if so close, but because they are framed inside this framework of occultism, it goes through the lens of occultism.

So what you find at that time: fascinating experiments happening in uh, Europe, including channelling, mediumship, and the lot. Along with all this the Theosophical Movement is established around that time with Madame Blavatsky as a master occultist but with a spiritual opening, and there are several such groups and lodges simultaneously awakening and openly communicating with each other, they all knew each other. I could go in detail in, with names, Rosicrucian Orders, Brotherhood of the Cross of Light, Fratre Luces, Order of the Brotherhood of the Light, Order of the Swastika, The Golden Dawn, and Mesmer, Cagliostro, Levi, Lytton, all these well known to each other and contemporaries and speaking of some possibility of a new awakening.

And among them there was this fascinating book that comes out which is called The Coming Race, which actually looks at the possibility of a new evolutionary step of a new human race, but, because it's bound in the occultism, it says, the character of this coming race will be an intensified occult power. And effectively it is mixed with the Nietzschean concept of Superman; so vital, dominant, egocentric, exaggerated ego, but now with occult powers: it can read minds, it can influence minds, it can wield the lifeforce, they called it “Viril”, and as a wielding of lifeforce openly they perform miracles, influence people, and so on.

Now if you go back in human history to a period which is still somewhat blurred in the collective memory and yet remembered, we have had this before many-many times. During the period of Atlantis, the leaders of society in Atlantis were these gigantic occultists, magicians, powers, powerful beings, sometimes with a spiritual opening, sometimes with a perversion, but with an occult power of this dramatic kind and with technologies to amplify those. We have seen the Middle East similarly, the period where lot of these power-beings would rule, and in place of God, they would take the position of God and subjugate humanity with their power. We see even in Egypt, similar thing.

(0:15:07):

In India though, because it was primarily a spiritual civilisation, though we have evidence of these, the great Rishis had extraordinary powers, the powers were always considered to be inferior to the spiritual growth itself. So, there was a protection because of this overall background. But humanity has been through all that, and to repeat that now would be a regression, and yet these ideas came forth very strongly, they influenced the whole direction of society and were behind the two great wars.

Now you see again from an occult point of view: 1914 Sri Aurobindo starts writing the Arya, the exact same month the first great war, world war, starts; and as Sri Aurobindo, or as the war ends, Sri Aurobindo ends the Arya also. Two dramatically opposite things happening: a surge of darkness wanting to seize humanity; and surge of light, and maybe you could say, the darkness came to block the light precisely.

But these ideas which were rooted now suddenly after the First World War became set aside as if, there was a reversal: The attempt by the dark to suppress this hope, this enthusiasm, was largely successful; and much of the possibility and the potential once again began to hide and hide inside these secret societies. Among them was one which was,—remember Germany was at the forefront, there are in fact many interesting things with the German secret societies of the Rosicrucians, Freemasons, and others, and some of the leaders there, many of these took these ideas underground inside their secret societies and prepared for such a change,—among them was this medium, extraordinary medium called Hitler, Adolf Hitler, he was part of these circles, he was not just a painter who suddenly becomes a leader, he was a part of these occult circles, the leader of that circle, and I forget the name now, declared openly: this man will lead the world one day.

And around this occult structure, framework, and organisation of many of these occult groups is now the rise of what becomes later the dominant Nazi ideology. Now if you go deep into the ideology,—not the propaganda which you hear,—you will find it actually mirrored many themes that you find in Sri Aurobindo but with a distortion.

So, coming new race, “… sun-eyed children of a marvellous dawn,”^[4] is a phrase Sri Aurobindo uses; and the Nazi had this phrase called Zonenkinder, children of the sun. And in their ideology unfortunately instead of worshipping the golden sun they worshipped the black sun, and the black sun has these rays which are crooked. Now I am going in some depth describing this because you will find all these will come back to us as we discuss certain current affairs which will be in the next few sessions, because this is a very active force even today, and quite openly, very organised.

So as this is happening, there is this ideology rising, it comes up, it is highly motivated, highly idealistic, and the young people who are sucked into this ideology are looking at the truth which is behind and, as I said, behind a light, behind certain ideas, which are actually evolutionary ideas, is a force of darkness which is the ego of the nation: the ego which wants to dominate and suppress and take charge and control of this hope and light and idealism but behind the cover of these ideas and light. This is extremely important to understand. It is the reason why when you look at the photographs of that period and you see these thousands of people standing with such uh, idealism and fervour, you have to understand, it had nothing to do with Hitler as such. Yes, he was a medium, and as a medium there was a power which could come, but it was also a national idealism to do something beautiful, to do something wonderful for the fatherland. But it stopped with the ego of the Fatherland and not the soul of the Fatherland, it could not widen itself to humanity which would have been the case had it aligned to the soul.

And Sri Aurobindo describes this with such great precision that it was the subjective age, Germany at the forefront of the subjective transition unfortunately stops short with the ego rather than the soul, and this is where everything goes offtrack. But as this is forming, with all these ideas, with all this idealism, a new step in human evolution is actually visualised by them, except now it is a vital-dominant ego-sense of a nation-ego.

So there were young people who were prepared to be the future leaders, they were trained, they were, even some of them were given birth to by a process of selection of the best genes, with the best education, with the best capacities and potential, and so on. Now all this is happening, but it’s seized and distorted. And on the other side you have the, eventually the allied powers, both are being funded by the same banks and the same families.

(0:20:26):

Now this also we have to understand, we will come to the question of the economics of today later on, but you must understand the same banking families, the same uh, industries are backing the two sides of the war. When you look at the United States debt, the debt at the time when the war started, if I recall right, would be about a billion dollars, US dollars, and at the end of the war it becomes 25 billion US dollars, just like that in a few years. That's the important thing.

You have to understand the agencies behind the wars, why they are funding both sides. On the one side, you have the, they didn't care who won. On the one side, you had the Germany and Europe which was largely destroyed, and the rebuilding, which means more debt. On the other side, the winners who for the purpose of winning the war had to go into debt. Both sides go into severe debt. From the banking perspective, it's a win-win, and they actually don't care who wins; or, they may even play the game of choosing, if they control both sides, to decide who wins for the maximum benefit and profit and subjugation of humanity.

So there's this big game going on. And you must understand, just before,—and it's all connected,—just a few years before, is when the United States government stopped printing its own money and transferred the power of the money-printing to a group which became, which was a private banking conglomerate, the United States to this day borrows money from this Reserve bank which is controlled by a private group of bankers and has to pay back interest to this private group of bankers. And you have to ask ‘why’? And all this happened, I think, it was 2012^[5].

In the sinking of the Titanic^[6], the four great bankers who opposed this move died; the one who stood for this move of privatising the bank was the one who at the last minute cancelled entering the Titanic. So it has given rise to the speculation that perhaps the Titanic was deliberately sunk because there was so much at stake in this. But whether it was deliberately sunk by human powers or by Asuric powers or by nature forces is irrelevant. The point is: at that point this transition took place, and it was decisive in what became the nature of the US economy which is now debt–based.

Every US dollar you will see on it is written, this is an instrument of debt. It is not money, it is borrowed debt that you have to pay back. Quite different from, let's say, the Indian rupee where there is the line that says, signed by the Governor of the Reserve Bank that says, I promise to pay the bearer the sum of rupees, whatever it is you are carrying, rupees 100. It is not a debt-instrument as such. It’s a representative of money held by the country.

Now this takes place, the First World War, everything gets suppressed and goes underground. The same ideals now come up with this warping of a control, and the second war takes place. The second war largely is a continuation of the first effort, and it's an attempt to unite Europe. It's an attempt to create what today has become the European Union but under the domination of one nation-ego.

What you have today is the European Union where it's not so obvious whether there is a dominant nation-ego controlling it all. Well, Germany still plays a very strong role, because it's the strongest economic power, but still you have at least some freedom for other countries to speak up. But what is interesting is, the same person who was the architect of the Nazi-map of Europe, which would be a united Europe under Nazism, the same person post-Second World War becomes the architect of the European Union and before that the European Economic Community. And I am giving you these details because you see a continuity of the same forces, the same ideals, the same intentions, the same means, well, modified means, perhaps, but the intentions, and ideals, and forces, even the players are the same.

(0:25:15):

Instead of a military domination conquering Europe, now it became an economic domination and an economic conquest of Europe, unifying it. What is interesting is, and Sri Aurobindo anticipates all this in his writings of, on human unity, the “Ideal of Human Unity”, he describes how Europe has to come together in this, and he says, first it will be economic, but then there is the problem of, you cannot complete the economic unity unless there is political unification of some kind. And Europe has cleverly bypassed this by creating a European Parliament which is not elected, which is selected by countries, and they decide, they do not represent the elected will of people, they do not represent your free choice, they are a cabal of interests who decide Europe's future and even economic policies which are then executed by the countries. And nobody thinks of it, because the media does an eyewash, the media distracts you. So all of this you have to understand after the first two discussions we have had, that's why it was so important for us to discuss this.

Come back to the situation now, during the Second World War, there is a huge thrust, a huge thrust of possibilities, including in this idealism, extraordinary breakthroughs in the sciences, in the organisational power of humanity, in the industries, in the economies, huge breakthroughs are taking place, across the world; and at the end of the war you have this disaster of a destruction, and the rebuilding. The end of the Second World War did one more thing, in continuation of the end of the First World War: it brought a huge, deep, profound cynicism. The cynicism already came at the end of the first war, it became profound at the end of the second, but at that point these institutions which had built up with these ideals went behind the scenes and took control from behind the scenes.

Now, I'm going to point to some specifics here again: How did this happen? At the time the United States entered the war, inside the US, they already knew that Japan was planning an attack on Pearl Harbor, and you will see now the evidence is in the open, this was conspiracy 20 years ago, now the US government openly says it, yes, the evidence was there, and they chose to wait to allow the attacks so that human, the people in the US would be accepting and would actually demand an entry to the war.

Had the US Government chosen to enter into the war by itself, people were opposing, the mood was wrong, so you have to get people to understand and accept this, and so you had the Pearl Harbor which was allowed to happen, and that shocked people, and now when the Government says, we have to enter the war, people says, ‘Yeah, of course, we have been attacked, how dare they’.

A similar thing which takes place in 1998, it was Donald Rumsfeld who is on record saying that for the US to enter the Middle East, it needs a ‘Pearl Harbor type’ event, and that's the broadly the quote, it needs a ‘Pearl Harbor type’ event to get the acquiescence, to get the support of the American people, which then happens with the 9-11, and with 9-11 as you know, immediately the Government made up these completely fake stories of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, invaded Iraq and then Afghanistan, and, of course, there were no weapons of mass destruction, it's all admitted today by the governments, but nobody is taken to task. When at that time from the US President through the entire  State department, the Foreign department, the news, newspapers, television channels, and experts on war, and TV channels, all of them were distributing pictures of the so-called weapons of mass destruction which were all fake.

So you have to ask yourself: Who has the power to actually orchestrate such an entire massive fake campaign to swing people's opinions, and then when the truth eventually comes out goes scot-free with not one squeak from anybody? To this day everybody knows, you know, you can find the evidence that it was all fake, and people say it openly, the journalists say it openly, but why is that nobody has gone to jail, because of this enormous lie and the consequence of it, I don't remember now, some 2 trillion dollars that the US dumped in the war and which became again an added debt to the American people, so by now the people should be rising in rebellion against the same Government or the representatives who lied to them, and the same television personalities who lied to them at that time are continuing today and still trusted by people.

(0:30:14):

So the two things you see here: There is a power that is so great, so powerful, so effective that it can swing and do exactly what it wants, and people will remain asleep; and on the other side, the people who to this day trust the same expert commentators who lied to them, not once but multiple times across decades. And now understand the relationship between these two: the sheep, will blindly follow, and the controllers. And this you cannot understand unless you go back to what we discussed last time. But even what we discussed last time is not the full story, we are completing that today.

So what happened at the end of the Second World War that made for this? And where is this power that is working behind the scenes? Who is really controlling?

When it became clear to the banking interests, let's say for now, who were funding both sides of the Second World War, when it became clear that the war was not going to be won, at least they would not create the world they wanted,—this unification of the world in a one world government through the war,—a decision was made at certain levels. There is a book which came out in 1943, before the Second World War ends, and I have that in PDF form somewhere, which if I recall the title something like, “How the Germany is preparing for the Fourth Reich”, or something like that, and it documents how the Nazi powers, who at that time were controlling pretty much the largest part of Europe, who had all the finances, who had all the resources, were spreading themselves around the world to entrench themselves inside systems, inside countries, inside industries, inside banking systems, inside the media, and buying up large parts of land, all over the world, in which they would bury and hide themselves.

It's just a, something I've read 20 years ago in that book because the book was published in ‘43, remember, the war had not even ended formally, and it's describing all this. And two things which I still recall:

One was South America where they bought large parts of land in some of the most beautiful spaces on earth, in Argentina and Brazil partly, but large parts in Argentina, where the Nazi elite went and settled; it established itself, created literally generations of followers, of descendants, with the same ideal that they had about this new Sun children that they called, a new elite humanity, which would rule the world, and they are still there with their same symbols on the swastikas, the distorted swastikas, and they live their lives in communities of some kind which are completely closed to the rest of the world. And they bought large tracts of land in Africa. In the middle of Africa, I don't remember now which countries but largely around the Central African Republic, and the total area of that land was bigger than a country in Europe that they had their own airports, governance systems, etc., which they built at that time. And the third area which is quite fascinating which is also very surprising because the documentation is there but we do not see any sign of it, they claim that they had built a base in Antarctica. And Antarctica as you know although it’s mostly snow, there are large parts in the mountains which are warm, which are warm springs, and a special group that went and settled in Antarctica declared that entire zone as owned by them as New Schwabenland and which had these underground and under ice installations at that time, built in 19–, from ‘38 onwards, built at that time, and the evidence, the documentation is there from that period.

And what is interesting is when Germany surrendered, New Schwabenland did not surrender. And at the end of the Second World War, the entire US Navy, instead of returning to the United States, went for New Schwabenland to Antarctica. And there they had a series of mishaps, they came back literally limping with having lost a lot of their planes and ships. The specifics of that is still classified on the US side. Russia recently declassified some documents and declared, which those documents declare, that when the US fleet approached Antarctica, they were attacked by a very strong military and they could not defend themselves. And the descriptions of some of their flying vehicles which were very advanced.

(0:35:14):

Now all this is to show you that there was a plan from 1940, ‘42 onwards at least to entrench themselves inside global systems. So when the Nazi regime fell, the entire elite largely vanished. Even as we say, Hitler died in a bunker, what's the evidence? You had charred bodies, the dentist of Hitler said, ‘ah, yes, the teeth match what I used to know’. That's it, there's no other evidence.

What you find instead, I'm going really off on a track, and I know that it risks surprising many people and shocking you, but it is evidence which you can verify by yourself, in 2018 or ‘19, Donald Trump declassified the documents relating to the Kennedy assassination. Now what is very surprising is when there was the investigation of Kennedy's assassination, the documentation of that investigation was classified and remains classified to this day. And when Trump wanted to declassify it entirely, he experienced enormous pushback from the intelligence agencies of the United States and the CIA in particular. So there was a compromise made and certain documents were classified, a bulk of them still remain, some were declassified, a bulk still remain classified. And you have to ask yourself, what happened that these documents should remain classified? What is it that is so dangerous for to be known even today? Well, among the documents that were declassified is an FBI report at the highest levels of the FBI where the FBI orders a special investigation of a report that claims Hitler is still alive living in Argentina at a specific village. You must understand the Second World War is already over. Hitler is officially declared dead in his bunker and the FBI is following a clue to his exact location in Argentina as part of an investigation of the assassination of Kennedy. How do you explain that? You cannot explain it on the official story. You can only explain it if you go behind the official story to what really happened.

And I'm going to touch upon a little bit of this. And as I said, all of this is evidence which is already available today, it's just not touched by the media, the mainstream media completely covers it, ignores it, or buries it, or ridicules it, but the papers, documentation, everything is there, and I will not go outside what is documented and verifiable on documentation at least.

So, something happened with the elite top brass which managed to escape, created an appearance of having been defeated, and if you go by the book published in 1943, they had already entrenched themselves inside systems around the world. Now what happened from the United States side, which we see again in documentation, as the armies entered Europe, they did not go to the concentration camps, they did not go to the cities to free people, they went first to the research centres of high technology across Europe which were controlled by the Nazis. So of course Germany had its own, Czechoslovakia had its own, Poland had its own, so they had centres which were decentralised, working on various very advanced weapons and technologies, and the US Army rushes straight there, seizes the scientists, in many cases they found scientists had been shot dead to bury certain technologies, the patents which were so well-organised by the Germans had been burnt, documentation burnt, some they managed to recover.

So now you have to ask yourself: What happened? What was happening there that the US government considers the war far more important in priority to go to the scientists and the technologies than to liberate the people? What was the war really about?

And it goes into a different direction, I will not enter into speculation, but these are facts and documented. John F. Kennedy was at that time a young man, he went there under the person who was one of the elite in the allied forces who later became the Secretary of Defense in the United States, so Kennedy had direct access to what was really happening behind the scenes and it was, he was the last president who actually did his best to oppose this for the reason for which he was assassinated.

Now what happens at the end of this is the agency built to fight the war and for the operation of the intelligence for the war was called the OSS, which was the Office of Strategic Services. At the end of the war it was decided that OSS had to be dissolved because its purpose was ended. And there was a huge battle which took place in the United States elite echelons of the military and the government and the industries which was hidden from the people and later leaks came out which made it public. The argument was that OSS is a secret entity, you have just defeated what was one of the most secret and dominating institutions, you don't want to recreate the very thing that you have defeated; you want transparency, you do not want to enter the same mistake which was made.

(0:40:51):

If I have to read, and this is from an article which is in the archives.government, US archives, they discuss it in these terms. Now this is from Truman library, sorry, archives is a different one. Truman library says, and they describe it in this way: “It was the product of debates among military, state and defense leaders, with input from the public, thanks to key leaks that took the issue to the newspapers. Coming off of World War II (and the defeat of a totalitarian Nazi regime), many Americans feared our own government would become what we just had defeated. Truman himself had similar concerns, but as the Cold War heated up, he became more open to its development. After much discussion and debate over structure, Truman finally signed the National Security Act in September 1947, which gave birth to the CIA.”

Now you see what happened, the Cold War started and that convinced Truman to give in, the Cold War itself was orchestrated behind the scenes by the very same groups which orchestrated the Second World War, and the same banks, the same institutions. So at that level, the Cold War was created to compel people to fall in line and accept a totalitarian government for your good, for your protection, for your defense.

And one of the things they used to do to prepare the future children to be fully programmed, as children in 19, just after the Second World War as the Cold War started, as children you were made to go through drills in kindergarten to instil the fear – that they would have a alarm which would go off and you were told to rush and hide under the tables, under the desks, in case there is a nuclear attack from Russia. It’s the most ridiculous thing. You cannot hide under a wooden desk inside a small building and protect yourself from a nuclear attack. So what was the point of these exercises? It was to instil the fear in little children, from childhood you grow up as the generation that is afraid of a nuclear attack and therefore will accept anything the government says as long as the government says, ‘Ha,  it is to protect you from the Russians’. That's the game.

So Truman was compelled by the same game and what happened then was fascinating. The Nazi regime had created the SS, which was the elite group. They had a super elite group which was into occultism but this was the elite group for the defense of the country and for organisation of intelligence, it was organised in a three-layer structure. The top leadership of the SS came over under Operation Paperclip, where the US government took all the scientists from Germany to bring the new technologies to the United States, including the rocket missiles, bombs and other high technologies and very advanced technologies, and along with it came the entire top leadership of the SS. So this Operation Paperclip, again, you will find all the evidence for all this intact, and this group that came in, came with the technology of how to build the, one of the most advanced intelligence agencies in the world which the Nazis had. And with all the control and network that they had already built up was transferred and the OSS became the CIA with this group at the heart of it.

Now this is so important to understand because now you see the energy which was behind this and working behind the scenes to control the world actually transferred itself and buried itself inside the US intelligence agency called CIA. And at the same time, remember the same banks are on both sides, the same industries are actually now supporting each other, and so on. You have something very interesting happening: the military now influenced by this group, and the banks, and the industry, and the politics begin to join hands. So when Truman signs this, it's too late, the change is made.

(0:45:03):

Eisenhower comes with his two terms and at the end of his second term he realises it's gone completely out of his control, the very thing that they feared that they were creating a totalitarian intelligence agency or interest group which is completely buried, opaque even to the elected representatives including the US Presidents. That has already come into being within his two terms he finds he has already lost control. And therefore at the end of his term he makes this very interesting statements and this was part of the US archives. Eisenhower, he says: “… we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. . . . This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. . . .Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. . . . In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.” And he says this in his last speech as he is speaking to the public. Had he said this earlier, for all you know he might have been toppled.

What happens next after is Kennedy makes a last-ditch attempt to override this takeover that has taken place. And you must understand the CIA at that point is not just an American intelligence agency, it is built on the network built by the Nazis and so it was already global. The Nazis had a global intelligence network going across all the countries of the world already and now amplified by the US economic power and industrial power. Suddenly this becomes the most powerful agency in the world, except, he warns, “The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist”. And he has used very clear language but subtly stated, so that he cannot be accused of too much fantasising.

What happens subsequently is this system goes and entrenches itself even in the United States government. Very quickly it takes the very structures which we discussed last time, it takes control of them, and these structures are now endemic in the US society. Every single one of the elite universities in the US has an official CIA representative on campus who is a professor and who organises an introduction to the CIA inviting all the elite students now to join the CIA. Obviously if they join or not is never made public. But sometimes it's just done as you know, it uses the cover of the light to hide the darkness, so it will say, ‘You love your country, can you make this little thing to help your country? It will save us so much trouble, it will put us on the cutting edge against those bad guys who are out to harm us who are ahead of us in such and such technology’. And of course you say yes, because of your patriotism. And the same structure that in the Nazism hijacked the patriotism and love for the country to spin it into a perversion continues in the same way. And the reason I'm pointing this out is because it does, it means the people who are part of the system may actually think they are doing good when they are being played to do the very opposite, or they may actually willingly go out of the way to do what they are told is good for the country when in fact they are causing more harm. And so it is very difficult to say they are bad people.

The bad people if any are at the elite top part of the control structure, but the people who are part of the machinery and the system may actually believe that, may actually believe, they are doing good. This is just to give a background. So when we criticise, you must understand, we are not criticising the people, we are not criticising a country, we are not criticising its masses, we are criticising the control structures behind the scenes, and all across the world, they hide behind. The most effective, the most convenient, and the most effective way of hiding all the mischief: Where would you hide it? Where can the cabal best hide in open space and get all the funding and do exactly what it wants? Inside intelligence agencies. Because by its very definition, the intelligence agencies funds are hidden, their goals are hidden, their means are hidden, their agents are hidden. What can you know about them? Nothing. By law. Isn't it?

(0:50:08):

And this is the joke. You try to create an open society and you actually buried everything, all the darkness inside a system which by your own definition of the system now can never be revealed and exposed to the light. And this is how they have got in and entrenched themselves, and it's not just in the United States. The CIA is again what we know of the CIA is just a front. It's that core group which is the, well, Nazi energy and idealism or goals which operate through the CIA extending into the Mossad inside elements of the KGB and of that period at that time inside every intelligence agency of any worth which plays the global politics has been either infiltrated or is totally owned.

One of the things which we saw, it was in the 1980s, that the CIA openly declared that their largest base outside the US was based in Pakistan. And what happened in Pakistan at that time? There was just this transition where the elected government had been toppled by the military. The military had seized control and had become or had become the base for the CIA at that point, ostensibly to fight the Russians inside Afghanistan and to train them, Osama bin Laden was their CIA asset, who later supposedly turned against them or was made a patsy for conveniently covering up certain objectives but the entire military brass of Pakistan was owned by the intelligence agencies.

When there was this whole question of entering the Middle East after 9-11 attack in 2011, September 11, 2001, when there was a whole question of entering the Middle East, India had offered to the US government saying, we will work with you because we have common interests to end this terrorism in the Middle East. The US government rebuffed India and went instead with Pakistan which was at that time the very opposite of US values. It was not democratic by any means, it had lost its democracy going back several decades. It was the most oppressive totalitarian regime but because it was controlled entirely by the CIA it was the true partnership for those objectives.

I am putting this in context so you understand the geopolitical decisions are not taken on superficial appearances or on a whim, they are led by this undercurrent which goes back all the way to the Second World War which goes back all the way to 100 years before which links to some other things before. And these are the interests, these are the control centres, these are the controllers whose name you will never hear in the media, or if you hear them it will be in a completely unconnected context and they will be presented as angels for whatever context they are offered to as, but in fact they are these controllers behind the scenes, and they play their game. And the game they play straddles across countries because burrowed inside many intelligence agencies across countries, they don't care who the elected representatives are, they play from inside the intelligence agencies on their own elected representatives.

And in time, if you see what we had discussed last time, this control now extends very rapidly through the young and upcoming potential leaders and seizes control of the entire machinery.

Now you see what's happened. The nature of this takeover is that through this hidden machinery you have unlimited funds, goals are never declared, you are accountable to nobody, your means can be anything including free assassinations of people who are inconvenient to you, and your actual ownership of people can never be known, by law. And all this is protected because of patriotism, you say, ah yes, our intelligence agencies, how can they ever do something against our interest? No, they are there not for your interest, they are there for their own interest and even extra national interests, multi-national interest, one world government interests, and that goes back to the Cabal that wants to unify the world inside this one world government.

And again people inside the hierarchies may actually think one world government, ‘Oh, that will be such a wonder’. They may actually believe it is a good thing. So we come across names in the United Nations for example, one of them I name because I know was very idealistic and yet became an agent for a lot of mischief and he believed in the one world government that it would be good for the unification of the world because eventually you have to unite because humanity is one. It's a very idealistic but immature understanding of the nature of One World Government world government, and it was one Mr. Strong. He was very effective, in fact his wife for a while was also on the Auroville board and she was very inspired, and I had occasion to meet with her, and wonderful people. But Mr. Strong was very influential person who believed in the one world government but with a spiritual intent in his mind and towards the end of his life, he was deceived, he felt cheated, he felt he had been used by the powers that be.

(0:55:42):

And I give this example because it does not mean everybody inside the hierarchy is evil, sometimes their idealism and sometimes self-interest is used by the control systems. So this is where we are today where national policies of countries are influenced by these secret agencies, sometimes within your own country, and they are interlinked across the world in a secret network which can, which has all the funds needed and can orchestrate anything through the media.

Now we come back to the example I gave earlier about what happened with the US invasion of the Middle East, that you were told that there were weapons of mass destruction which might be used all over the world. If you recall when Bush announced that they just discovered the Al-Qaeda network, just like that, overnight, we were told, the network exists in 150 countries and has so many operatives and it is already entrenched and it is planning these terrorist attacks in every country—just like that. And then he declares, this war is going to go on for many decades—war against terrorism.

And of course the whole thing was made up. For what? And there were other objectives, including profit, control of oil, etc. So the question was really: Why invade Iraq when supposedly the 9-11 attack had taken place by the Al-Qaeda which was based in Afghanistan? What was the connection with Iraq? They didn’t, didn't even care to explain. They didn't care to explain because they don't care, they know they can play you because they own the media. So they announced weapons of mass destruction, got your acquiescence, went in, knocked out Saddam Hussein.

What had happened– if you look at the two years before, Saddam Hussein had announced that he was going to sell oil in local currencies, including the European currency, and not US dollar, and this was the one reason why he had to be toppled. The same thing happened with Gaddafi, Gaddafi had tried to organise. Yes, we are all told, he was a crazy man, you have shown pictures of him railing and screaming. But do not listen to the media, look at the work he did. What did Gaddafi do? He organised in Libya the most extensive water distribution network, created over a span of about 10 years a resurgence of very high quality agriculture,—a country went from extreme poverty to excess of food,—and he shifted his national currency to the goldbase, spoke of unifying Africa around this goldbased currency, and actually openly declared, whatever he might have done before, he openly declared, ‘I do not want wars’, wants to make peace with all the countries which he has criticised before and wants the development of his country.

When he starts doing this and is successful, he has built all these canals, the first thing that happens, the US steps in because now he wants to sell oil not in US dollars, the US steps in, bombs him out. First thing they do, they bomb all the canals and destroyed the economy. To this day Libya is split into two groups: Eastern and Western, they are always in fighting. Recently there was a dam burst. You are probably aware. Media hardly covers this. There was a dam burst, entire townships washed out, and they say, it's because since Gaddafi was overthrown, there is only this internal civil war and the dams were not maintained and eventually they collapsed because of some strong storm.

I am linking all this, but you see the understanding behind, you have to see it as a global play of a global chessboard, global intentions: protect the power of the US dollar because that's the way they fund all operations. Now the US dollar you have to understand, remember, it goes back to 1911 or ‘12 when the US indebted itself to private banks, so US dollar effectively represents the power of these private banks, and through the US debt they buy up the world.

(1:00:00):

And how did the US do it? Well, they just print more money. And they print money, everyone goes into debt, but the US sells that cash, uses that cash to buy up products around the world. Why would anyone want to accept this paper money? For the simple reason that, that's the only currency in which you can pay for oil. So if you want to buy oil, you need US dollars. In order to get the US dollars, you sell products to the US, you can't sell them to the EU, you can't sell them to China or to Japan, because then you don't get the US dollars to buy your oil. So the oil economy was the means by which the US economy was held high by the dollar being the only currency for trading in oil. And that was ensured through military invasions where needed.

The first thing they did in entering Iraq was they replaced the Iraqi currency with the US dollar and brought the oil transactions back to the US dollar. Now I am showing this because you have to understand the motivations could be as trivial as this but behind this trivial appearance is something extremely important. The very financial power with which anything in the world can be bought by just printing paper, by the elite Cabal, which wants to, well, rule the world. Unfortunately the way it’s structured the US people become the debtors except they don't end up paying debt because the government is printing money and just spreading out the money ensuring that they don't go into debt but there is an inflation. It's not the US who faces the inflation, it's the world who faces the inflation because all the cash is pushed out, and you as a country are required now to accumulate the cash and save the US from entering inflation.

You see, if there was too much cash floating in the US, it would be inflation. But if all the cash is sucked out immediately by the countries for paying for oil, there is no inflation. And if you look back at India going back let's say about 20 years, India used to proudly say that we have some 50 billion dollars in ‘US currency reserves’. Today it's gone some 400 billion dollars, 500 billion dollars. The numbers keep going up. Why? The price of oil has not gone up, why does your reserve currency stock for buying oil have to keep going up?

Well, because that's the control system. And the government, politicians, do not understand this, they are not consciously a part of it, it is the Reserve Bank Governor who is part of this who keeps ensuring that you have to do this and if you don't, then the entire media attacks and sinks your currency. And this happened in the South East Asian currencies. If you recall, 1997 or so, when the Southeast Asian currencies just sank overnight, and they were bought up dirt cheap with dollars by US companies which had just paper money basically borrowed from banks and just bought them out.

But who made that happen? The same name you see here now many times, George Soros, was responsible for sinking the currency by playing it, he's not alone, he's backed by all these banks. They decide ‘Okay, we are going to sink this country’ because it is not doing what they want or because ‘It‘s become too independent and we need to own anything that’s independent’, so you sink the currency and take over.

And so, when you look at the big picture, you see these interests operating ‘like that’ across countries, they don’t care who is elected, at the end of the day, the only thing that matters is the elected follow their agenda, or submit when they demand, or they are removed. Suddenly you find a scam, head of a state is suddenly caught in a sexual scandal, the entire media goes after him until the person is removed and somebody who is controlled takes his place, and that's it. Very simple to replace. And worst case you have an assassination which is never explained, which is what happened with Kennedy.

And so this is the background of how the status quo is maintained and the control is maintained across the world. Behind this, one of the key-elements for this control is the media. The media is so structured that no more you have independent media, all media is owned by corporates. Look for example at Washington Post, is owned by the, the owner of one of the social media companies, the name slips my mind. So, but each of these, any newspaper that becomes large enough is now owned by social media company owner which are of course themselves fronts. Uh, the owner of Amazon, he owns [the Washington Post].

So everywhere in the world you'll see, even in India, for a long time the Indian government did not allow media to be owned by foreign interests, all this changed in the mid-90’s when India opened up,—‘opened up’ means, came under World Bank policy control,—and they allowed foreign companies to own the media up to 49%. You see the mischief is like this. Once the 49% is owned, then one day very quietly the politicians will be told, ‘Okay, just allow 2 more percent’, 49% becomes 51%, and that's it your majority shareholding; all policies, all content of media is now in foreign hands. And if you don't allow that, it can be done through proxies: you can have an Indian company owned by a foreign company or controlled by a foreign company that invests and takes control. There are many ways to bypass any system control that you create.

(1:04:49):

And since then, the entire media across India is owned by the foreign companies, foreign interests, uh, one of these very, I think, it is Times of India, has large parts of an investment from churches in the middle in, in Europe. Churches investing in Indian media for what? And once you understand the full picture of who is behind playing then you say, ‘Ha-yes, of course they have to do it because they want to control the public discourse, and the media becomes that’, except the new media, social media, try to replace that so they had to own social media also.

The second problem media has is that it is dependent on advertising revenue, which may be either governments or businesses. So already, first, corporate ownership has slanted the media. Second, the media dare not criticise the government because the government ads are the biggest income for any media, at least in India that is still the case, or it is businesses who pay you money to promote their products, through ads or sometimes through placements of articles. So you cannot criticise. For example, there is nobody in any media across the world who will ever criticise soft drinks,—for all the things they cause everything from cancer through to depression,—they will never criticise because, well, the soft drinks are paying them all the time; the day you criticise them, they will not only pull out they all gang up together,—you remember what we discussed last time,—they all are interconnected, they all gang up together, and all of them stop paying you money, you sink overnight.

This is what they tried to do with twitter when Elon Musk took over Twitter. When Elon Musk took over Twitter, all these companies which were upset that he was liberating Twitter and no more allowing the censorship of speech, they pulled out all the ads, and he had to find various other means. But this kind of ganging up against somebody who does not play their game or is not in their control is the pattern today. And this is the reason why it's very difficult for any entity to break away and especially inside the media.

The third problem with the media today is the source of the spin. Who tells you which is the priority to give? Let's take the Ukraine war, and we will speak about it in a few sessions. Who, who decides: Which is the angle you should take? Which side you should support? What evidence you should offer, or not offer, or spin in whichever direction? So even if you have people in your media system who are sympathetic to one side or other, what happens next is, those who are controlling either as experts or as reliable sources, etc., who decides that? Media. The media are the ones deciding which direction the narrative will move. So these people were propped up.

I give an example of how that works. Look at the United States, every single one of these persons who has a talk show by their own name, David Letterman and all these late night talk shows, all of them, go back to their history and you will find they were for a while inside the CIA or some intelligence agencies. When they retire from that, they are put inside the media and given a job which is basically now controlling information flows and propped up by the media by everyone else saying, ‘Ah-yes, this person is wonderful’, so they form a club of mutual praise and anybody else coming, they will criticise until you are sunk. That's it.

Very rarely, somebody manages to survive on intrinsic strength, and when they do that, the rest of the media now gangs up and does the next part of the game, is, they play rating agencies. A rating agency will decide which media will get more advertising and at higher price. So if you control the rating agency, you can declare ‘That media ..’, and suddenly all the prices go up. The same for businesses. If you are part of the Cabal, the rating agency gives you a high rating, so you can borrow money from banks at very low interest rate, sometimes 0% interest. If the rating agency gives you a bad rating, you pay very high interest. And that's how they decide which companies will grow and which will sink. So companies like Amazon, going back now 30 years, has never shown profit, and yet all the investors are investing, staying invested, and they are borrowing money from banks to keep expanding.

(1:10:32):

How? They are borrowing,—not at high interest rate,—at practically zero interest rates. Why? Because they are part of this control system where the banks want a monopoly to destroy all the local little shops and build this controlling monopoly. Same for all these big companies, Walmart and others, they don’t need to be profitable and compete on the same scale as the smaller companies because they get 0%-interest funds, and the investors are part of the game. So the rating agency actually decides, and it is so subtle, it is so simple. And who controls the rating agency? You never know. Isn't it interesting?

One more last layer which they have to control: if, take the example of Twitter, because Elon Musk freed Twitter, and suddenly you had free speech allowed on a platform with a large number of people. What happens next? They start labelling the platform with all the nasty keywords. So if you go back to the US in the 1950s, the nasty keyword was ‘communist’, ‘So and so is communist’, that's the current anti-ideology. You are communist, you are thrown out, nobody wants to trust you, nobody listens to you. Today in the US, nobody criticises someone for being communist, you are criticised for being right wing, extremist. I am going to list a few: racist, patriarchy, anti-feminist, male chauvinist, supremacist, Islamophobe, transphobe, anti-Semitic, casteist. You can be thrown any of these slurs. Now what is interesting is, the nature of the slur, you have been so deeply programmed that the moment you are told, ‘Oh, that fellow is right wing’ or ‘patriarchal’ or whatever ‘phobe’, you immediately distance yourself and distrust anything they say.

So what happens for example, the Indian government in the west is labelled ‘right wing’, anything that has to do with the BJP or the RSS, the keyword in front will be ‘The right-wing Modi government’, ‘The right-wing minister’, ‘the right-wing so and so’, or they will build in a few other labels – ‘supremacist’ or ‘nationalist’.

See, interesting is, the word ‘nationalist’ is turned into a bad word. So if you go anywhere in Europe or the US and you are reading mainstream media, you will have the impression that India is controlled by a bunch of extremist right-wing uh, believers. But inside India you look at that and say: Oh-yeah, for the first time here is that somebody who has actually changed the economic situation of the country, built the roads, brought electricity to every village,

and removed corruption by making direct payments possible without having to pass through these agents. Well, good, isn't it?

I am going to take a few names and I will elaborate on some of these names later, but some of these names will shock you if you have already been programmed to think negatively about these names, but I would suggest simply even if you feel shocked, just wait, because the basis on which we have to judge these people, politicians, is not whether they are nice, it’s not whether they speak nicely, whether they look pretty, or what they say, or the promises they make. You have to judge them purely by their actions. And if the person does action which benefits the country, benefits the people without compromise, then it's a good  politician, it’s a good leader.

If the person speaks a lot of nice words, makes good speeches, smiles well, looks nice, and the media gives them a beautiful spin, but does everything opposite, sinks the economy, but says, ‘There is no way we can prevent it, that's the nature of the world economy’, then they are mean and even perhaps perverse or evil, sometimes incompetent, but at the very least incompetent, mostly evil intentionally. So for example in India, before Modi came to power as the Prime Minister, the previous governments all were saying whenever there was economic uh, downturn, they will say, ‘We can't help it, it's the global economy which is going through a downturn and so India is part of the global economy, you have to accept prices will rise and you will lose money’. That was the constant uh, refrain.

(1:15:00):

Under Modi we saw a different approach to economy which looked at India's interests first and even when the global economy had a major downturn, India went on rising. Why? Because the, the, the economy was well-managed. So I don't care what you think about him, or his speech, or his words, or his appearance. In terms of actions you judge, ‘This was good for the country’.

Whether it was him, or whether it was someone behind him, with someone beside him, or someone implementing a good intention which he might be incompetent for, I don't care. The fact that this man could empower people around to do the right thing is all that matters. That's his role. So I take another example from uh, Elon Musk. He, on taking over Twitter he threw out to the Indian head of Twitter CEO saying: This guy is too nice, we can't have such a nice person leading a company and making it do something worthwhile because then you get pushback and he does not know how to override pushback.

That was Elon Musk's opinion. And I'm taking this as an example, because there's a truth to it. Especially when you enter politics, the mechanism of getting elected is so nasty, and especially when the media attacks you because you're going to do good and you're not part of the control system globally, you'll be so viciously attacked that you need to have thick skin, and nerves of steel, and a very good organisation, and clear, cool head to survive those attacks. And when you do get to power, even if you have the media backing, to be able to do good, there are so many interests which push against doing good because they want to cling to their benefits, that you need to be totally impersonal, you need to still have compassion because you have to have compassion for the people that you have to serve but you need to be totally impersonal and take hard, painful decisions, always involving some compromise.

And if you are surrounded by the wrong people, you have to be able to say ‘No’ to them, you need to be very strong and thick-skinned. So, an effective leader in such circumstances will necessarily have harsh sides, if they are to be effective. And I am giving this as a preparation because we will speak of some of the global leaders perhaps next time and look at why they were attacked by the media, what they have done, or what they represent in this transition, and the, then you will understand why the next one and a half years will be so critical. So just to, in anticipation, next year we have the Indian elections and the US elections, and the leadership which comes to power or not is going to decide literally the fate of the world for various reasons which we will see, because it all ties down to what we have been discussing so far. We will also touch upon the Ukraine war and other things. There are a few questions, I'm holding off from the question in chat box now because I want to complete this discussion and then we will take up all the, the questions.

Anupam has asked still, “Why did the US fail in Vietnam?”: They failed for other reasons, because the method of war was no more sustainable. The world had changed, and this is what you see in Ukraine when we speak about it. The nature of warfare has fundamentally changed, and this is the reason why now uh, the side which is, which wants the war to continue is actually testing their most advanced weapons, because they don't know whether those weapons work.

And the second thing which you have to understand which happened in Vietnam, the US lost its capacity to fight on the ground. It was not just Vietnam, you see the same thing in Iraq, you see the same thing even today in Ukraine, or anywhere else where the US is on the ground, they have to partner with others and have the others fight their war, and they provide the logistics control, they sell the arms etc., but the US soldiers are no more battle-hardened on the ground. I am not speaking of the commandos and elite military but the common soldiers are not battle-hardened.

And I will end this part of the discussion with just two observations. Look at what has happened to the US military today. During the Second World War, the US had 7 four-star generals, just 7 four-star generals which fought this global war. Today, the US has 40 four-star generals with all their entire machinery of interests, and demands, and needs, and retinue of offices and bureaucracy. 40! Which wars is the US fighting? It's strange. How did the military go from ‘that’ to ‘this’? Well, there was an underlying interest, and we will come to the full .., we may touch upon that maybe, but just to show you that there has been a massive decline, and yet this decline is uh, the last hope for the world, in the sense that in the battle that takes place today to defeat the global cabal, the involvement of the US military will be extremely important, because it’s the only entity that exists as a military force which can actually defeat on a global-scale cabal interests.

(1:20:18):

Now the cabal today, as we have seen, we started with the CIA, but it’s no more limited to the CIA, has actually built across the world not only this control system in the mass media, not only a control in the politics, not only a control in the economies, in the businesses and especially in the multinationals, not only control of the reserve banks across the world, but they control the global UN institutions which are meant to become eventually the one world government, and they have independent of all this, their own air force, their own navy, their own submarine force, and their own armies, sometimes these are private armies.

You see what happened when the US was fighting in Iraq, it was not the US soldiers so much,, they had their private mercenaries. I don't remember the names now, Halliburton and others at that time, some of them were shut down, they changed names, but basically they keep rotating under different company names, they were the ones doing the stuff. Why? Because the US government had to maintain hands-off, get the dirty work done by others who could remain secret. If the government did it, someone had to be accountable and you could not hide it for long. So they contracted it to these private entities who fought the actual wars.

So what has happened today is, there are these private armies which are owned by the cabal interests and they play for the governments as required, and they make money in the process by various means. So there is a book I will highly recommend, two books I will recommend, I have put it already in the description of the discussion. One is called Confessions of an Economic Hitman by John Perkins. The second one is called Manufacturing Consent by Noam Chomsky. And there is a third writer John Pilger who I will recommend also because he has videos, he has articles, you can look at. These are people who discuss these things,—but not necessarily from this angle which we have looked at from the underlying spiritual occult angle,—they look at the economic aspects of it and how these things are manipulated.

John Perkins, as a Confessions of Economic Hitman describes how, he was working for companies whose job it was to lull countries into going for major development projects and then pay people inside the countries to delay those projects and thus push the countries into debt. And he was responsible for the sinking of various economies which he mentions in his book. And how they did it: sometimes they would corrupt the leadership at a political level, bribe them, or sometimes blackmail them, or they would fund environmental groups. So here is a dam which the country is going to build for which it has borrowed money from the World Bank, and now this Hitman comes, they fund money by environmental groups who do sit-ins. You as a common man, depending on where your interests lie, you will criticise the dam and support and fund even the environmentalists or you will say ‘No, we need the dam because of the benefits’. Either way you are played.

Because if you fund the environmentalists, the dam is delayed and the country goes into a debt trap, because it cannot pay back the money which would have been earned by selling electricity at the end of the day, which now gets postponed by a decade or two. Or, if you go for the dam, then you are suddenly destroying an environment, or whatever it is, dislocating people, they have you fighting each other and delaying development. Does that remind you of something you see everywhere in the world today? Groups fighting each other, preventing development. And you are too busy fighting to stop and say: What do we aspire for as a humanity, as a nation, as a people? What's the progress we want? Can we make that progress? Because you've been brainwashed into taking sides in fake conflicts.

And one of the most powerful methods they use is something called ‘controlled opposition’: the moment they find enough people in the world who are criticising X,—intention, objective, institution,– they will create an opposing anti-X group which is controlled by them, you now align to the anti-X group, and now the anti-X group takes you off track. It's called ‘controlled opposition’ which effectively becomes in the political space what is called the ‘uniparty’. So in the US you have democrats, you have republicans, when it comes to war in Ukraine, all of them give funds, they do exactly the same thing. Are they really Republicans? Are they really Democrats? No, they don't have any ideology, they are only controlled members of these interests, and when the interests pull the strings, they will do exactly the same thing, cutting across party lines.

You saw this in India going back decades. Look at Tamil Nadu politics, you had just two parties swinging, once every five years they would switch with extreme corruption, and they did exactly the same thing.

(1:25:16):

The same thing you saw in other state politics until the BJP came to power and changed the game, because the group that was the basis of the BJP which is the RSS, their very foundation was: love for the country, service for the country. And if you enter politics, you do it for that; you may be incompetent, but you will not sell out your country. This you can be assured of. And I will be, I will be the first to criticise the BJP for all its failures and for what it has not done. But I cannot criticise them for having sold off the national interests, as all the previous parties have done, going back decades. And this is the reason why the media will now gang up and attack them and call them everything from ‘right wing’ to ‘patriarchic’ to ‘chauvinist’ to whatever, because they are not controlled for those interests.

So this is to give you the big picture of who is behind it all. And behind it all is this very secret group you will never get names, because they are hidden inside the system, which we gave them the power to hide inside, and from there it works. Now the only entity which can fight this,—it's not us, we can't do it on an individual level because they have the means to protect and defend themselves,—the only entity which can fight it is an organised military and that's in the US which is large enough to go against it; Chinese military is already part of the group, they want a system which is absolutist.

And will that military be able to rise to the occasion? I don't know. Maybe not. It doesn't matter for now. From our point of view, what we can do: First, become clear. Wake up. Remember the Mother's message, “wake up and collaborate!” ^[7] The first part is “wake up”. Of course, she gave it in the context of “wake up” to the spiritual truth and the consciousness ahead, but I'm also extending this to understand what's happening, how you're being played.

Don't play the game. First understand what's happening behind all these appearances. And then the next step: You can start aligning yourself to a higher, deeper, more truthful interest, representative, action, or whatever form it takes.

So I'm going to take names, please don't worry if you feel strongly against some name that I give, just wait, listen it out, understand what's happening, sometimes you.. there's nobody who's perfectly right or perfectly wrong, but understand the larger play.

Anything which goes against the entrenched cabal is good for humanity, even if the person is not, may have whatever flaws you may see. And it is extremely important for humanity to break out of this cabal stranglehold, break out of this one world government which is now being accelerated rapidly. And the imposition of lockdowns which now you already see happening in many parts of the world is part of that game.

So we are going to continue this discussion, and this time we will take names and look at specific circumstances in the world in our next part of the discussion. But keep this big picture behind the scenes: Who is playing the game? The same interests who rose during the Second World War, who were behind Nazism, who wanted to create a one world Nazi government of an elite that rules the rest of the masses as cattle and which would block human evolution by a thousand years, Sri Aurobindo said, delay human evolution by a thousand years.

The same group is actually working behind by other means for the same objects, under different names, under different guises. And this is where we are today. So I'm going to take a pause here, and I want to.. since Narad has been listening quietly for so long, Narad would you like to say something?

Narad (1:29:11):
I've heard so much and I looked at this Ronald Bernard who you mentioned.

Sraddhalu (1:29:21):

Yes.

Narad (1:29:22):

Umm, I didn't feel it was too strong, but they were very good points.

Sraddhalu (1:29:29):

Yes.

Narad (1:29:31):

And  I think we need to hear more about the good people also.

Sraddhalu (1:29:39):

[laughing] Yes.

Narad (1:29:40):

We need some good names out there.

Sraddhalu (1:29:42):
[laughing] Yes.

The angle that Ronald Bernard brings particularly is the occultism behind which I did not touch upon today, maybe I will elaborate on that.

Narad (1:29:53):

Yeah, good!

Sraddhalu (1:29:54):

.. tomorrow, uh, the next time, the next week. But I want to complete then with two quotations from the Mother, again these are New Year messages that she gave at that time, just after the Second World War when this cabal was entrenching itself around the world, hiding behind the scenes and taking over all the international institutions to build its one world government.

(1:30:18)

So 1955 and 1957, two messages:

1955: the Mother says, “No human will can finally prevail against the Divine’s Will. Let us put ourselves deliberately and exclusively on the side of the Divine, and the Victory is ultimately certain.” ^[8] 

It's very interesting, you have to re-read this: “No human will can finally prevail against the Divine’s Will.” Yes, you can prevail for a short time, you can win battles for a short time, but “finally” you cannot prevail Divine Will, the Divine's will has to prevail because it is the underlying truth of things. That “finally” is of course a point of dispute, it can be a thousand years, it can be a million years, but “finally”! [laughing] But we are at a time of crisis where the “finally” will perhaps not be a thousand years, maybe much less, let's hope for that.

But then the other part which is very interesting: You see, people keep saying: Do you have the Divine support? No, that's not how you should think. You have to think of: Are you supporting the Divine's Will? So the Mother says: “Let us put ourselves deliberately and exclusively on the side of the Divine, and the Victory is ultimately certain.”

And this is the way out in this present crisis. And so we will look at what this means practically in a situation like the Ukraine war, there are two sides fighting, we will understand- what are the interests, and what are the behind-the-scenes interests, and then what is the side of the Divine. And then you will realise, it’s not about taking political sides; the Divine side is, the war has to end, because the interests behind which want the war are against evolution, the war has to end by whatever means. And then we can discuss how those means, what those means could be.

But the “exclusively on the side of the Divine” means to be able to feel what the Divine wishes, or very objectively you may look at what will lead to human beings waking up more rapidly: not about destroying this, not about defeating that, but human beings becoming more conscious and waking up to the realisation of the Divine Presence and their spiritual potential. Think in those terms and then see, which side is more aligned to that or less aligned.

And like I said, when you look at politicians, it will always be mixed, but which is more aligned or less aligned, which allows this opportunity, which suppresses or snuffs out this opportunity, then you know which side you have to take on those situations or with those people. But remember it's not the people, it's this intention that you are standing for.

And then the second message which is very telling, 1957, the Mother writes: “A Power greater than that of Evil can alone win the victory. It is not a crucified but a glorified body that will save the world.” ^[9]

“A Power greater than that of Evil”, and she puts ‘E’-capital, “can alone win the victory”. And so, this “crucified but … glorified body” is also interesting not in terms of just the symbol of an individual,—well, in that case you can say the Christ's body crucified, it's not that, it's not sacrificing,—“but a glorified body”, you can think in terms of a transformation. But consider these words now at a collective level, individually for each one of us, but also at a collective level.

It's not by sacrifice and allowing yourself to suffer that you are going to help this awakening, but by awakening in consciousness as a collective, this is the “glorified” collective body, if we take it, or a “glorified” individual body, and it is that which will save the world. And “Power greater than” the “Evil” is of course the Divine, us opening to the Divine, becoming vehicles, aligning ourselves to the Divine, putting “ourselves deliberately and exclusively on the side of the Divine, and the Victory is ultimately certain”. This is the direction we have to consciously move towards.

And when we look at the circumstances of the world, we will try to understand them from this perspective. I think, this is a good point on which to align ourselves in aspiration, all together, wherever we are around the world for the awakening of humanity and for the Divine Will to fulfil itself most rapidly through us and through the circumstances in the world.

Namaste.

Alina (1:35:21):

Namaste.

---